In mathematics, including 25 Fields Prize winners, they have identified a growing concern for potential harm due to the rapid development of artificial intelligence (HI) in the mathematical field. In their latest statement, published on June 11, they talk about “serious inconsistency” between the goals of companies that are breaking up the world and with mathematical precision.

Our main task is complex, but we understand that this is the essence?

Over the past few months, great modern models have demonstrated significant success in the most advanced mathematical works, whose operations were deprived of unrelated fates. However, according to the authors, the company’s focus on random mathematical problems as “test projects” for the world can be harmful to both the science itself and its predecessors.

“The goals of companies engaged in HI seriously diverge from the goals of mathematical sophistication,” according to the statement.. This, in my opinion, is partly a broader problem of convenience that affects other scientific and creative professions, and therefore marriage.

The essence of mathematics: not less than proof, but understanding.

Mathematics, as a fundamental science, determines the structure of numbers, forms and natural phenomena. These developments have been going on for centuries, forming a collapsible toolkit for understanding the world, which, in turn, lies at the basis of modern science and technology.

Mathematical cohesion, similar to marriage, consists of individuals with different approaches, sharing common values. Traditionally, the process of starting mathematics focuses on the development of skills necessary for studying other areas of activity. Mathematicians share their knowledge through lectures, discussions, and detailed writing, which is the result of constant interaction.

“The interconnection of tasks is merely a tool for achieving the goal: conceptual understanding and insight. Forgetting someone in the galuzia can lead to the fact that the tools are being taken away from the main purpose,” they anticipate. The stinks also indicate concern that the mass and Swedish generation of “true and wild” solids can “nourish the soil”, instead of giving life to new ideas.

Problems of authorship, plagiarism and knowledge transfer.

The publication of the findings, which are separated from each other, is often published without proper formalization, analysis of new methods and sending forward work.. This gives rise to serious problems of authorship and plagiarism, as in any other creative profession.

In addition, the ideas that have been raised by many may never be fully implemented, as there are only a few mathematicians who are ready to take credit for their development and integration into. This also leads to a critically important contribution to the transfer of knowledge between generations of mathematicians.

Wider context: threat to the intellectual nation.

The statement suggests that a “solid threat to the intellectual race” is being guarded through the inconsistency between the countries of the world and its cob.. The fate of the beginning traditionally shaped the residual result, and developed the structure to a deep understanding and the establishment of new nutrition.

“Today’s systems are increasingly creating results without any consequences, based on the great achievement of human achievements, which makes it unreasonable to pursue initial goals,” the authors say. The problems facing mathematical strength are similar to those that face other scientific and creative professions, and represent broader calls for humanity: to ensure that we do not forget the primary method of work,.

The Future of Mathematics: Adaptation and Degradation?

There is potential for a thorough and accelerated learning and understanding of mathematics. The profession of mathematics will require adaptation to these changes. However, whether there will be any changes to the corrosiveness, which will result in a flood of ruin, it will be important for people to decide how to control this new technology.

The application calls for a dialogue between the mathematical team, the retail companies and the partnership, in order to thoroughly search for the highest levels of these naked foods, which are based not only on mathematics, but also on riches..

25 Fields Medal winners who signed the application:.

Arthur Avila (2014).

Manjul Bhargava (2014).

Coucher Birkar (2018).

Pierre Deligne (1978).

Deng Yu (2026).

Simon Donaldson (1986).

Hugo Duminil-Copen (2022).

Alessio Figalli (2018).

Martin Harer (2014).

Jun Hoo (2022).

Maxim Kontsevich (1998).

Elon Lindenstrauss (2010).

Pierre-Louis Leon (1994).

James Maynard (2022).

Curtis McMaclan (1998).

Shigefumi Mori (1990).

Ngo Bao Chau (2010).

Andriy Okunkov (2006).

Peter Scholze (2018).

Stanislav Smirnov (2010).

Terence Tao (2006).

Marina V’yazovska (2022).

Cedric Villani (2010).

Wendelin Werner (2006).

Yukhim Zelmanov (1994).

Deng Yu's comment: zhart about \?

As reported by the South China Morning Post, Fields Prize winner Deng Yu recently wrote on his WeChat account about the “unsettling atmosphere” in math stakes..

“Meni truth tsikavo, between possibilities. Since AGI can solve a wide range of mathematical problems, it will create wonders for your life - but that’s not bad at all. After this, I might just turn home and write “?

“(a novel about lesbian sex),” wrote Vin.

However, in a commentary for the South China Morning Post, Deng Yu clarified what he was saying: “I’m not writing in truth.”? Tse bulo said zhartoma. I don’t think it will be possible to achieve a complete solution to all mathematical problems, such as those that I thought about in my post.”.

Dzherelo: https://www. ithome. com/1/001/554. htm25 Fields Prize winners: “Mathematics has a serious problem” read on the HiTech website. Expert.