Advocate General of the Supreme Court of the Netherlands confirmed the groundlessness of the complaints of " Ukraine positively assesses this decision, Deputy Minister of Justice of Ukraine Iryna Mudra said in a commentary to Ukrinform.

“According to the Dutch judiciary, such an advisory opinion precedes any decision of the Supreme Court. And although the court is not legally bound to adhere to the findings of the Advocate General, statistics show that the court makes its decisions based on such independent findings in 95% of cases,” she said..

According to Mudra, if, based on the results of consideration of the cassation appeal of the so-called Crimean museums, the Supreme Court decides to review the decision of the Court of Appeal, it can adopt a provision on the applicability of the UNESCO convention, as provided for by the decision of the first instance..

"

Since the Supreme Court is the highest court in the Netherlands, its decision should be final in the case of "

[see_also ids\u003d"

" First, the exhibition was taken to Germany, and then in early February 2014 it was moved to Amsterdam.

After the annexation of Crimea, some of the exhibits were returned to the Kyiv museum, but a problem arose with the rest: legally, the exhibits belong to Ukraine, so it is wrong to return them to the Crimean museums under the occupying Russian authorities.

At the same time, the Crimean museums demanded that these exhibits be returned to them.. In this regard, the Allard Pearson Museum in Amsterdam, in which the exhibits are located, decided to give them to those who will be allowed by the court.

In October 2021, an Amsterdam court ruled that " In January 2022, the occupiers filed an appeal against the court decision. The final decision of the Supreme Court of the Netherlands is expected on September 15, 2023.