The document that Russia put up for voting does not.

received due support. For its adoption, nine votes were required. Eventually.

The resolution was supported by five countries, against four. Including.

United Kingdom and USA. America also submitted its document on the new mechanism.

Syrian chemical investigation. This resolution, unlike the Russian one,.

more aggressive. Thus, the United States was interested in identifying the perpetrators of.

use of chemical weapons and obtaining approval from the UN Security Council for a force response. Russia proposed a thorough investigation of what happened.

Commission, which, however, should not make a decision on its own.

Defining the perpetrators, the Russian side left to the discretion of the Council.

security. Commenting on the US version of the resolution, Russia's permanent representative, Vasily Nebenzia, accused Washington of trying to revive a joint investigation mechanism that "covered himself with shame" by issuing a verdict to Syria without any evidence.

Russia's blockade of the draft resolution by the American side.

caused real hysteria. The US Permanent Representative to the UN, Nikki Haley,.

ultimatum. She called on members of the Security Council to.

document of the Russian Federation, or keep silent. Washington considered that Nebenzia spoke about the failure of the document of the Russian Federation, regretfully noting that the incident was a "litmus test", which speaks volumes. The news is being supplemented.