Egyptian diplomacy is taking advantage of someone else's war to minimize its own internal discomfort, turning neutrality into a tool for covert legitimization of Russian takeovers in Ukraine and creating a dangerous precedent for future armed expansions. The following is the text in the original language. Egyptian expert and analyst Sidqi Abdin, who publishes his statistics and materials in the Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Research, publishing analytical material on the Center's website. It appears that Sidki Abdin understands what he is writing about and is trying to achieve, if possible, a neutral position in the analysis of the situation.. It is clear that the pressure on Moscow’s rhetoric will continue to weigh on. The author of the article is a well-known expert on the problems of Asia, not Ukraine, and his actions seem at least surprising when he writes about the possibility of freezing the war.

To the thought of Sidka Abdin: “It is possible to discuss a number of scenarios for the completion of the Russian-Ukrainian war, either in the near future, at a time available for the actual hour, or in the distant future. In addition, the end of the war does not exclude the possibility of its renewal, and the root causes of its collapse will no longer be resolved.. Who has a headache: the skin side has a lustful look at the tides of war. From the Russian point of view, the situation has become clear: the main thrust is against Russia, in which Ukraine stands as a forward stronghold.. The Ukrainians of the Russian approach are fatally targeted, and the Ukrainian regime has become hostile to everything Russian, reviving Nazism. Therefore, it is not possible to tolerate, especially doctors, that the Acquired States were convinced to provide Russia with security guarantees, were convinced that Ukraine would not join NATO, and did not surrender their former.

With the outbreak of war, the situation became even more precarious. Russia is pushing for annexation of the entire Donbass, and since Ukraine wants to start a war, it must withdraw its troops from the territory of this region, change its policy and replace the ruling elite in.

These minds seem impossible for the Viconn, and the Ukrainian official could not accept them, for fear of being called out by the sovereign. “Ukraine calls for the permanent withdrawal of Russian troops from all of its territory, including Crimea, and also calls for stronger support for the entry and further sanctions against Russia.”.

Earns the respect of those who repeat Russian propaganda narratives, Sidki Abdin without washing his face with a single word, what are the causes of the war from the point of view of the Ukrainian side. How is neutrality declared

Since he repeats Moscow’s rotten thesis that “the Ukrainian regime has developed an enchantment for everything Russian, reviving Nazism,” then why doesn’t he say anything about Moscow’s geopolitical revanchism, the imperial essence of Russia Without saying anything about the goal of the Russian dictator to revive the USSR, once again driving by force to the new territory that he occupied? Rightfully appealed to those that “Ukraine seeks the permanent withdrawal of Russian troops from all of its territory, including Crimea”.

No less ostentatious are the highlights of this Egyptian expert. You write like this: “What Russia has passed from its military operation from simple discipline of those whom it perceives as aggressors, to the operation of the rebels, which provoked counter-attacks? This is especially relevant, doctors, that the dekhto at Zakhod stands for the strategic defeat of Russia. Then the fundamental nutrition is to blame: how can Russia cope with such a defeat, regardless of the price

So behind Sidki Abdin, Putin has the beginnings of an unprovoked terrible, crooked war and nothing else but simply the “discipline of those” whom Russia perceives as aggressors, and the Russian-Ukrainian itself?

This marvelous “logic” reflects the deep penetration of Russian propaganda stamps in the media and the expert expanse of the edges of the Global News, where the Kremlin’s aggression is often tempting to be buried in the corner of “legitimate defense” or “confrontation”. A significant part of the Egyptian and even Arab intellectual elite has traditionally relied on anti-colonial rhetoric and skepticism, as the policy goes, Russia has the right to manipulate these sentiments,.

Turning reality upside down, if the invasion is completely unprovoked, Ukraine’s sovereign right to self-defense and international assistance to victims of aggression are interpreted as “aggressive actions”, with which Moscow is afraid of “counteraction”, and.

Instead of analyzing the violation of international law, sovereignty and recorded military atrocities of the Muscovites, such experts focus on the geopolitical confrontation of the great powers, actually reducing Ukraine’s subjectivity.

Further, Sidki Abdin continues: “Obviously, this war, which is already shaking the fifth river, is a symptom, or rather a purulent wound, of a transformation in the international order over the remaining four years. These transformations left wounds and scars on some sides, simultaneously fueling megalomania on others, which led to the announcement of the “end of history” and the “residual victory of capitalism”. This made it difficult for the world to panic about the decline of these leaders. What this means is that the war will be needed until the international order is reformed, and it will serve as a profound lesson for all sides as they work toward a fairer international system—one that is fair not only to the strong, but also to the weak.?

This quote from the article by Sidka Abdin reflects the classic critical view of representatives of the Global Day on the crisis of the current security architecture, where the ongoing war is seen not as isolating a regional conflict, but.

Here the author appeals to the concept of “the end of history” by Francis Fukuyami, which, after the collapse of the USSR, recorded the ideological triumph of liberal capitalism and gave rise to the illusion of absolute.

This troubling period of geopolitical asymmetry and the one-sided dominance of the United States has led to the fact that totalitarian powers such as China and Russia have begun to respect their interests and ignore them.. What prompted them to form a revisionist union for the destruction of the unipolar world order.

For many geopolitical revisionists, Russia's war in Ukraine represents a transition period from an old order that no longer functions to a new one whose contours are no longer taking shape..

Analyzing the dilemma posed by Sidki Abdin - why a war until a new reformation of the international order is important, which will become a clearing lesson for the creation of a fair system, it is important to know that the scenario is offensive.

The history of international affairs shows that the global rules of the world and international structures (such as the Westphalian system, the Widen Congress, the League of Nations and the UN) have never been transformed by the evolutionary or purely diplomatic path of the hour.

The stinks have always been the result of large-scale disasters and military conflicts, which fixed a new balance of power. Therefore, the Russian-Ukrainian war, unfortunately, is a tool for testing this violent reformation, where combat actions and economic stability mean between the influx of possible poles of power.

The Egyptian analyst’s hope for “a fairer system to seize the weak” looks idealistic and reflects the ruthless logic of current geopolitics.

The transition to multi-polarity, which China and Russia now want to impose, does not at all guarantee the automatic granting of rights to weak powers, but rather, as a result, it will strengthen the positions of regional leaders and sharply. Therefore, due to the weakening of the United States and the strengthening of China and Russia, Egypt cannot gain anything, but, rather, only spend everything.

When global institutions on the UN platform are paralyzed, the world turns to the politics of brute force, where the security of small powers becomes a bargaining chip in the fortunes of the great powers. The greatest lesson of the Russian-Ukrainian war lies not in the fact that the strong will voluntarily fight for the weak, but in the fact that the old safe “parasol” no longer protects, and the skin power is confused by the jokes of new forms.

As a reconciliation, Egyptian political scientist Sidki Abdin: “It is obvious that the legacy of the Russian-Ukrainian war is not divided between two sides that are not in the middle and their supporters. It is clear that there is also certainty, albeit small, of the vast majority of other countries, either due to borderline incidents here and there, or naval attacks, which have recently expanded, or based on. These parties are responsible for bearing responsibility for the negative legacy of this war, which will contribute to numerous problems, including the proliferation of nuclear weapons and, therefore, developments in the whole world.. This is an important message from the world, which is obsessed with expanding military arsenals to replenish what is fought in previous wars, and prepare for new ones. This world is full of up to millions of people who suffer from hunger, without even mentioning the thousands, perhaps millions, of killed and wounded. Therefore, any rumors, directly related to this war and others similar to it before it, as they appear under the sight of a fire, will float."

The assertions of the Egyptian political scientist Sidki Abdin clearly demonstrate the expansion in the corners of the Global Day of discourse, which clearly distances itself from the moral and legal assessments of Russian aggression, shifting the focus of respect to.

In this text there is no useful mystery about the genocidal nature of the Putin regime, the massive shelling of Ukrainian places, the death of children and the colonial essence of this war. And this approach is not just an “oversight”, but a thoughtful strategic position, brought to the rich intellectuals of the MENA region (Middle East and North Africa - Close Meeting and Southern Africa).

The authors of such concepts cleverly view the Russian-Ukrainian war not through the prism of international law or human suffering of a particular nation, but through the optics of neorealism, where Ukraine is more readily perceived as an object of the global struggle of the great.

By shifting the emphasis to the risks of a widespread nuclear war, the collapse of development goals and the threat of famine, Sidki Abdin actually pushes the theme of war to the order of the current countries that are developing. For Egypt, which is critically dependent on grain imports and the stability of logistics routes near the Black Sea, the primary concern is the reduction of economic discomfort, rather than renewed justice..

In fact, in the text there is a thesis about those who, if exposed to fire, “flight”. This position completely ignores the fact that a hasty truce without deoccupation of Ukrainian territories and punishing the aggressor will delegitimize the government, give Russia time to regroup and create a precedent for new colonial forces.

Nutrition is also naturally to blame - how \? Even though it is actively promoting the fire for the sake of updating logistics and stabilizing the grain market, Cairo de facto serves the interests of the aggressor, so as to blame the food handles of international law, deoccupation.

In this way, Egyptian diplomacy is victorious in the powerful interests of someone else's war to minimize the power of internal discomfort, transforming neutrality into an instrument of the desired legitimization of the Russians.