Who won and who lost in the Middle East?

Today, 19:56 | Peace
photo Обозреватель
Text Size:

So who won and who lost in the Middle East

Let's sharpen.

Let's start from the base. Victory is a world better than the previous one.

The following is the text in the original language. Apparently, the defeat is the world that lies ahead.

Wars rarely end with the victory of one side and the defeat of the other (the other side is a culprit). Most often, wars end with the destruction of all sides.

It’s not surprising, doctors, that war brings death and ruin.

Ale is one important nuance that is often missed. I also skip it for simplicity. Ale not now.

Peremoga is the world that steals from the front FROM THE VLASNOY ZORA POINT.

This is an important nuance, which is true that different sides of the war can have different criteria for what is good and bad for them. Plus, there is the danger of the presence of a cognitive domain, in which damage and victory can be reversed by the enemy (for example, it is possible to reverse the victory, which is the result of the program, and Moscow itself works with us after our victory, and so on.

It seems that Iran has recognized its defeats: the bombings have been carried out and thrown back dozens of years ago.

Ale smut: the regime of the Ayatoll is in force, the nuclear program will continue, and control over the channel will become obvious. The US may think that Iran has recognized its defeats, but Iran has moved on.

It seems that the United States succeeded: they overcame hundreds of tactical victories, demonstrated the strength of their armor (which, insanely, outweighs anything on the planet), they themselves recognized minimal losses, pushed the enemy back dozens of rocks. Of course, Trump will be able to vote epically. But in fact, the United States would emerge from the war in a worse situation, but the truce was the same (but not worse) than before the war; With allies in Europe sealed, and with allies at the Close Convergence, America looks like an unreliable leader. The ability of the United States to achieve strategic goals is in doubt, due to the strength of the American defense. And the smut: the political goal of the war is not stated - to put flows under control - has not been achieved.

The Arab monarchies experienced pure defeat in this war. The economical model has been developed for decades and has emerged with a bang. Mayday under nutrition.

Israel, at first glance, recognized the defeats from the United States. From this point of view, he has changed: looming a clear political goal, he has realized - by weakening and throwing out Iran, launching an attack on himself and securing a couple of dozens of losses in the world of peace.. However, the Iranian nuclear program has gone nowhere.

Europe won: it demonstrated its integrity and spent nothing.

Ukraine won. I don't think I need to explain.

Russia lost. Lost an ally, made it impossible to defeat allied challenges. The high price of naphtha is offset by the costs of export infrastructure.



China has gained as much as possible, having lost additional opportunities in the region and having achieved peacekeeping through Pakistan.

Axle like this picture.

To what extent can I add what I wrote yesterday: another time after “Kiev in three days” it was demonstrated that the important military strength is not given back to the defeat of a significantly weaker country, since there is a normal industrial.

Chat in the comments. Just don't forget the basic principle. Peremoga is the world stealing from the front line.




Add a comment
:D :lol: :-) ;-) 8) :-| :-* :oops: :sad: :cry: :o :-? :-x :eek: :zzz :P :roll: :sigh:
 Enter the correct answer