Invaders and Invaders. Point

29 October 2018, 14:14 | Policy
photo ТСН.ua
Text Size:

Putin once again blurted out something about the illegal transfer of Crimea to Ukraine in 1954, and it started again - legally, illegally. Listen to all that xp * nh already completely unbearable. Especially from the Ukrainians, proving the "legitimacy" of the transfer.

My friends, if you recognize the legality of the transfer of Crimea to Ukraine, then you must recognize the legitimacy of the Holodomor. He, too, was under Soviet law. And the legality of the Gulag, the legality of repression, executions, occupation, deportation and everything else that freaked out the USSR. It was all "legal" too..

Doesn't care at all whether the Crimea was legally transferred or not.. Because the Soviet Union was all illegal, from beginning to end. And appealing to one part of its laws, protesting against another - this, I beg your pardon, schizophrenia.

We do not recognize all the laws of the USSR - and the point. In relation to the evil empire can only be such a position. But what matters is that in 1991 Russia signed international documents that recognized Crimea as Ukrainian, ratified them in its parliament, and a year before the war reaffirmed the ratification of this agreement.. And yes, Putin did it personally..

Everything. Point.

And do not care what was there in 1954. Or in 1642. Or in the seventh century BC. The law is not retroactive.

In the newest history you already agreed with the new borders, signed documents on their inviolability, ratified them with your parliament, recognized the primacy of international law and committed yourself not to violate it - everything. Conversation is over.

From now on, you are invaders and invaders..

In the framework of the project "Journalism without intermediaries" Original Also join the TSN group. Blogs on facebook and stay tuned for updates!.




Add a comment
:D :lol: :-) ;-) 8) :-| :-* :oops: :sad: :cry: :o :-? :-x :eek: :zzz :P :roll: :sigh:
 Enter the correct answer