In Ukraine, there are fines for traffic violations. In particular, not only drivers, but also pedestrians can receive fines.. The publication Auto24 told what kind of fine pedestrians can face when crossing the roadway in an unspecified place.

According to h. 1 st. 127 of the Code of Administrative Offenses, pedestrians crossing the carriageway in unspecified places or directly in front of approaching vehicles, failure to comply with other traffic rules, provide for the imposition of an administrative fine in the amount of UAH 255.

[see_also ids\u003d"

So, recently, the courts have massively begun to confirm the guilt of pedestrians in violation of traffic rules..

In particular, the District Court. Poltava decision from 20. 03. 2023 in case No. 440/16607/21 found guilty a pedestrian who crossed the carriageway outside the pedestrian crossing. The court agreed that the pedestrian violated the. 7 SDA and must be held responsible for hours. 1 st. 127 CUAO.

District Court. Chernihiv decision from 06. 03. 2023 in case No. 748/241/23 found guilty a pedestrian who crossed the carriageway outside the pedestrian crossing, if any. The court confirmed that the pedestrian violated the. 14. d SDA and a decision on an administrative offense under h. 1 st. 127 CUAO legally.

Also in Cherkasy, the district court by decision dated 01. 02. 2023 in case No. 711/6953/22 found guilty a pedestrian who crossed the carriageway outside the pedestrian crossing. The court concluded that the pedestrian violated the. 9 SDA and must be held liable in the form of an administrative fine of UAH 255.

Kyiv District Court. Poltava decision from 31. 01. 2023 in case No. 552/9091/22 found guilty a pedestrian who, in. Kharkiv crossed the roadway outside the pedestrian crossing and did not have retroreflective elements on it. The court concluded that the pedestrian violated the. 14 SDA and the imposed fine in the amount of UAH 255 is lawful.

[see_also ids\u003d"

Similarly, the courts of appeal support cases, in particular the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal by decision of 18. 01. 2023 in case No. 697/1099/22 found guilty a pedestrian who ran out onto the roadway where the transport was moving. The court concluded that by his actions the pedestrian violated the. 14.

b SDA than committed an administrative offense for hours. 1 st. 127 CUAO.

Such court decisions indicate that the attitude of the police towards offending pedestrians has changed.. If the pedestrian violated the rules, he should be held responsible, as well as the driver. Pedestrians must also follow traffic rules to reduce the number of accidents caused by them..

Earlier we wrote that the police began to massively fine drivers for cracks in the windshield of a car, although this is illegal..