Regarding the grandiose scandal (and the massive hysteria of the powder) caricatures of the artist Klyuchnik. After any swearing and discussions, I am ready to briefly sum up my own opinion..

First, I, naturally, for Autocephaly; the legitimization of the UOC in world Orthodoxy - in the interests of the believers of Ukraine.

Secondly, the artist has the right to draw what he drew, we have not the Orthodox Taliban here yet.

Thirdly, personally, my caricature LIKE me, since our state already risks just with its head, beyond any measure, to get into the management of religion. This is dangerous, and may simply be unconstitutional.. The concept of separation of church and state was embodied in the practice of advanced civilization is not fools. Sorry, fools, this is among us, who think that it is possible to ignore world experience without damage to the country. Actually it is impossible. Caricature is talented, and underlines the legitimate concern of part of society.. Including my.

Fourth, the fight against the subversive anti-state activities of the MP, which the MP, without any doubt, systematically deals with, should, in my opinion, be led by law enforcement officers (SBU), and, if there is not enough legislation, then BP.

And we should not allow ourselves to be drawn into a semblance of a holy war of religion, brandishing documents wickedly on the 16th and others.. centuries. Tomos, in itself, can not expel MP from Ukraine. (And, nevertheless, where are the tons of video and audio recordings of the imperial pro-Putin propaganda of the priests of the MP, which the SBU should, by all logic, tirelessly do at least 4.5 years?).

Fifthly, I read several large publications / interviews of Filaret on the subject of Tomos’s provision, and what he believes should follow - and this, in my opinion, is rather moderate and reasonable.. In contrast to the nonsense that gunpowders carry and just faint of heart people.

Sixth, I do not study and review other work thin. Klyuchnik, his working career, and so on, is not obliged to know and appreciate any of this. I don't care more or less. If it was he who introduced Rotterdam + or bombarded the prosecutors with diamonds, or committed other atrocities, well, let him go to jail for it. I do not know this person and is not associated with him.

Seventh: I am not an atheist, but certainly a secularist. I consider it simply unacceptable for the state to be bound to religion; braces are again from the practice of Mordor. "Skrepoy" of the Ukrainian society, if anything so called at all, I can only name the Constitution.

Eighth:

at one time I was in Odessa at the French cultural center for the rally in memory of the murdered journalists "Charly Hebdo," and I consider the whole topic to be serious and important. No, as a rule, I don’t like cartoons of "Charly Ebdo" much. But their right to conduct their activities is certainly beyond any private assessment of what they do..

Signed by caricature: "Vorfolomіya's Entry into B. "Http: // jjoriki. com / vstup-v-bpp. html Odessa Daily. Spelling author left unchanged.