Regardless of the pressure of the devils and the scum of the judicial corps, the independent commission of KMI supported the actions of the referee and VAR in the episode with the fall of Diallo in the match against Bournemouth.
The Commission of Key Incidents in Premier League Matches (KMI) delivered its verdict on the most sensitive episodes of the 31st round. The most controversial issue was the refereeing of the match between Bournemouth and Manchester United (2:2), where the decisions of the referees dramatically affected the final result.
Super emotional moment betting for the 1:0 rakhunka at Manchester United. Away winger Amad Diallo fell into the penalty box after Bournemouth manager Adrien Truffert placed both hands on him. .
Video assistant referee (VAR) Craig Pawson confirmed the decision without giving “clear and obvious mercy”. Immediately after this, Bournemouth launched a counterattack, and in the 67th century, Ryan Christi leveled the rakhunok. Substitution of potential 2:0 to the core of Manchester United, the numbers on the scoreboard became 1:1. The KMI panel sided with the referees, voting 3:2 against awarding a penalty.
The commission's resolution reads: " Two experts who voted “for” called his actions “non-football”, but the commission unanimously supported the failure of VAR in this episode. United's administration was dissolved by the judiciary and announced its intention to file official charges for the sake of Professional Match Refereeing (PGMOL).
The main complaint was the lack of consistency, and even in this same game two other penalties were awarded for similar offenses. Team manager Michael Carrick called Attwell's decisions foolish and divine:.
“A great moment, and I don’t understand how it’s possible to date one thing and not another – without God’s. As much as it is obvious, as much as possible. It is understood that if the final episode of the penalty is considered, then the other damage may be like that."
Alex Jimenez sneered at the T-shirt of Matheus Cunha (for which a penalty was awarded - a decision, since KMI had been unanimously winning 5:0) Alan Shearer also expressed solidarity with the position of the coach, saying:.
“If you awarded two such penalties, you could not have awarded one more?
Since the commission makes assessments based on individual incidents, and not on the basis of the world's convenience between one match, several important decisions were praised for this match and other games of the tour:.
Violation of Maguire: The Commission voted with a majority of votes (4:1) to award a penalty and a red card for Manchester United defender Harry Maguire for a foul against Evanilson. (This kick from the marks was successfully realized by Junior Krupi, establishing a residual ratio of 2:2).
In this case, the conflict between these two Gravians on the 23rd century was unanimously recognized as such that it did not deserve a penalty.
The score in the match between Chelsea and Everton: KMI recorded a single effective penalty on the field in the 31st round. According to experts (3:2), the referee awarded a penalty at the Everton goal for James Tarkowski hitting Vesli Fofan in the chest with his hand. However, VAR decisions were not implemented in this episode, but it was confirmed (3:2). Varto notes that at the time of the incident, Everton had already given up the score 0:3 (85th century).