The UAF Referees Committee together with arbitration consultant Nicola Rizzoli explained the controversial episodes in the matches of the 24th round of the Ukrainian Premier League.

Obolon—Minay. Referee - Maxim Koziryatsky. VAA - Andriy Kovalenko.

9 hv.

Assistant referee-2 mildly recorded the position of the “growing pose” of attacker No. 9 Minaya (in such situations, we remember that when arbitrating with the BAA system, it is necessary to delay the signal from the ensign until the completion of active attacking actions). The referee correctly pauses in order to determine the result of the completion of an unsafe attack (and, as a result, to give the opportunity to award/correct the BAA) and penalizes the goalkeeper for an obvious foul. The first decision on the field is a strong blow, since (according to the assistant’s assertions) the attacker is in the “playing pose” position.

VAA correctly checks and is involved in this situation, which is determined by the actual decisions (look at the field (PNP) is not required), so that the referee has accepted his decision on the field (in case of “play position”) - free kick / red cards ka for ZOGM.

52 hv.

Gravets No. 4 (Obolon), trying to hit the ball with your head, vikorist’s hand (elbow) and your opponent’s face. This action is an obvious, careless (careless) action, as it is punishable by a foul (at the edges of the penalty area - penalty) and a dead card (this action does not respect attempts to play the ball and will therefore require punishment).

The BAA correctly decided and recommended the PNP for obvious reasons, after which the referee correctly awarded the penalty.

56 hv.

The goalkeeper, after the referee has allowed a penalty to be taken, and before the attacker (after the kick) touches the ball, sticks forward, without placing one foot (or its projection) on the line.. By stopping the kick from the penalty spot, the goalkeeper causes damage, protecting the goal from the goal. If the fragments are first damaged by the goalkeeper, then the penalty kick will be repeated without the loss of the second card (which will be incurred in case of the next damage). It should be added that the referee correctly advised the goalkeeper before the penalty was awarded, reminding him about the importance of not leaning forward before the kick was awarded.

The VAA correctly verified the actual actions of the goalkeeper and recommended, based on clear video evidence, to repeat the resulting penalty..

Oleksandriya — Dynamo. Arbitrator - Oleksiy Derevinsky. VAA - Igor Paschal.

45 hv.

Gravets No. 9 (Dynamo), trying to play with his head, vikorist’s hand (elbow), with a forward blow to his opponent’s face. This action is clearly a careless (careless) action, as the person guilty will be punished with a foul, and may be given a yellow card.

VAA perform a double check, the fragments in such situations do not involve the red card (there is no supernatural force in the actions of the attacker).

64 hv.

Gravets No. 4 (Olexandriya) loses control of the ball through a low back pass (attempt to win with his right foot) and fights off the croc, at which time attacker No. 6 (Dynamo) fights with him in a fair manner, without committing a foul. It is important to ensure that the arbiter is in complete control of the situation and is at the optimal level. Technically, make sure that the attacker’s foot (No. 6) has already taken a position in front of the opponent (the foot is completely on the ground) and that No. 4 itself is pushing the Dynamo gravel behind the back of the boot. For these reasons, a foul was not correctly called in this situation.

For these reasons, we do not believe that the VAA system was handed over to this situation. This is the case (even though we can have little discussion food), insanely, we can’t accept the mercy, and the referee after the PNP has correctly deprived the power of his first decision, take it to the field.

Vorskla - Shakhtar. Referee: Oleksandr Omelchenko. VAA — Denis Schurman.

56 hv.

Gravets No. 11 (Shakhtar) does not allow the goalkeeper to enter the gate and, trying to play ahead, does not allow himself to put his foot in, which ends up incriminating the goalkeeper. The speed with which the attacker approaches until he wins, making such dynamics of combat unsafe for the opponent. We must remember that one of the main goals of the rules of the game, and therefore the arbiter, is the very protection of the gravers and, at the same time, the gatekeepers in the power square, if they are on the ground, in order to protect their gates. For these reasons, the red card must be inserted correctly.

This visual dynamics (advancement) can change the intensity of contact, as there is daily fluidity in which the attacker approaches the goalkeeper. Suddenly you can see how the gravel is trying to move his leg in order to avoid the inevitable contact. For these reasons, we can evaluate the handing in as borderline (on the monitor screen) and not clearly the handing of BAA both at the draw of a red card and at the draw of a yellow card.

Earlier, the UAF announced its latest audit results - the increase reached a maximum of 1.5 billion.