The results of negotiations in Saudi Arabia: there are no real significant results

27 March 2025, 20:24 | Peace
photo Обозреватель
Text Size:

Slava Ukrainian!

Glory to the Zahisniks of Ukrainian, such!

News from the USA. Tuesday, March 25, 2025.

* In Saudi Arabia on Tuesday, separate negotiations of the US delegation with Ukrainian and Russian delegations ended on Tuesday. The White House published separate messages based on these negotiations.

To understand what the general result is, you need to compare these two messages.

So, the report on the results of negotiations with Ukraine says:.

"

2) the United States and Ukraine agreed that the United States is still committed to assistance in achieving the exchange of prisoners of war, the release of civil detainees and the return of forcedly displaced Ukrainian children.

3) the United States and Ukraine agreed to develop measures to implement the agreement of President Trump and the President of Zelensky on the prohibition of blows on energy facilities in Russia and Ukraine.

4) the United States and Ukraine welcome the good services of third countries in order to support the implementation of energy and naval agreements.

5) the United States and Ukraine will continue to work on achieving a strong and long world ”.

The report on the results of negotiations with Russia says the following:.

"

2) the United States will help restore Russia's access to the world market for the export of agricultural products and fertilizers, reduce sea insurance costs and improve access to ports and payment systems for such transactions.

3) the United States and Russia agreed to develop measures to implement the agreement of the presidents of Trump and Putin on the ban on strikes on energy facilities in Russia and Ukraine.

4) the United States and Russia welcome the good services of third countries in order to support the implementation of energy and naval agreements.

5) the United States and Russia will continue to work on achieving a strong and long world "

Clause 2 of the Communist on negotiations with Ukraine - the promise of the United States to promote the solution of humanitarian issues - the exchange of prisoners, the release of Ukrainian citizens taken hostage by the aggressor and returning home to Ukrainian children stolen by Russia. All this sounds, we can say that good. But there is nothing like this in the Communications about the negotiations of the United States with Russia. And this means that paragraph 2 of the Communications on negotiations with Ukraine is a declaration of good intentions in the absence of specific mechanisms for their implementation. Moreover, the Trump-mask administration stopped financing an organization engaged in the search for children stolen by Russia, under the pretext of reducing expenses.

Clause 2 of the Communications on negotiations with Russia is the actual consent of the Trump administration to remove part of the sanctions from Russia (for example, Russian ships are prohibited from entering American ports, Russian banks leading calculations for the sale of Russian agricultural products and fertilizers are under American sanctions. Perhaps some of the Russian ships were insured in American companies that are prohibited from providing such services).

No wonder Russia immediately stated that it will fulfill this agreement only if the corresponding sanctions are removed from it.

But I must say that Trump's capabilities are not endless here. Mostly British insurance companies are engaged in sea insurance. Access to payment systems is access to SWIFT. Once I had to say many times that the United States could not disconnect anyone from Swift. Because Swift is in the jurisdiction of the EU. But in the same way, the United States cannot restore someone's access to Swift. This can only be done by the EU by abolishing its appropriate sanctions. In the same way as access to British insurance services can only be restored by the UK government, but not Trump. And access to Russian ships to European and British ports cannot be restored by Trump. Trump will probably try to influence the UK and the EU. However, judging by the reaction of the EU and Great Britain to the peacekeeping of Trump, which we have observed so far, to imagine that they will agree to remove sanctions from Russia at the moment. Far from the last word here will be for Ukraine. And the meeting of the presidents of Zelensky and Macron, which should take place on Thursday, will play an important role.

Clauses 3 of both communities are identical to where the United States is going to develop the implementation of the agreement on the prohibition of attacks on energy facilities. This item in both commander looks strange. It seems that Trump agreed to terminate the attacks on energy facilities separately with Putin and separately with Zelensky, and now the United States will “develop measures” separately with Russia and Ukraine to implement these agreements. How can you agree on something without mechanisms for the implementation of this agreement, it is not clear. It can be assumed that it will be possible to " If only Putin does not decide that the termination of strikes on his oil refineries and oil storages for him is more profitable than the continuation of the destruction of Ukrainian energy infrastructure. A similar decision may depend on how he perceives the state of his economy. And from how important it is for him to meet in the near future with Trump.

Clauses 4 of both communities are identical and declarative. They do not say anything specific, except for the hypothetical possibility of attracting third countries, for example, to monitor the implementation of hypothetical agreements.

Clauses 5 of both communiques are completely declarative. Especially in relation to Russia. How will it " Knowing the Russian history and the history of the “struggle for peace” in Soviet times, about which the people back in the 70s of the last century said that the “struggle for peace” will be such that there will be no stone on the stone.

What is the result? The impression is more than such that the White House decided to sweeten these two communities with the lack of real significant results. Will there be a ceasefire in the Black Sea? Russia clearly answered - only if sanctions that prevent her from trade in their agricultural products and fertilizers are removed from it. Will there be a termination of attacks on energy facilities? If there are " Here again, one can recall how the USSR and the United States has been developing measures for years to control the implementation of hypothetical agreements on the reduction of weapons, and the USSR at infinitely continuing negotiations explained why he did not agree that the Americans inspected Soviet plants at which rockets and Soviet nuclear forces are manufactured.

Trump dreams of meeting Putin. Most likely he really wants to be in Moscow on May 9. Putin would also like to meet with Trump, but unlike Trump, for whom such a meeting would become the embodiment of his secret dream, Putin needs a meeting to emphasize that he is not only in isolation, but can also humiliate the United States in front of the rest of the world.

Trump is inconvenient to meet with Putin, not hiding behind at least some formal agreement on a temporary, at least limited, partial ceasefire. Putin prudently takes the steps that do not binding him, which the American president, in his opinion, could perceive as sufficient to remove obstacles to meet. The United States lose their authority and influence, and Trump’s daily statements that he can stop the war, that we are ten steps from the world, that if he were the president, there would be no war, they were no longer perceived by anyone, since we stopped carrying any information.

The main question, which does not have an answer, is the question of what Trump will do when he understands that he cannot get the cessation of the war from Putin, whether he will do something at all, or, as in the case of nuclear disarmament, Kim Jong-un, he will simply wave his hand and continue to “do America Great”.

* On Monday in the United States, a big scandal broke out. The editor-in-chief of the Atlantic magazine Jeffrey Goldberg published an article in which he said that he was invited by the national security adviser to join the Chate group in the signal messenger. After a short time, in this group, which also included Minister of Defense Hegset, Secretary of State Rubio, special envoy Trump Vitkoff, Director of National Intelligence Gabbard, Director of the CIA Rutcliffe, Head and Deputy. The head of the White House apparatus and the Minister of Finance began a dialogue on the infection of the United States on the Yemeni Hussites. The Minister of Defense Hegset revealed all the details of the upcoming operation - which weapon, where and at what time will be used.

I can imagine what Jeffrey Goldberg thought about when I read it all.

This is the most perfect madness - the Minister of Defense, the Secretary of State, the Director of Intelligence, the National Security Advisor is discussed in the commercial messenger installed on their private mobile phones, the detailed details of the attack on the hostile US terrorist organization, while the national security adviser to the chat, in which this discussion takes place, is also invited by the journalist, and one of the participants of the chat is a special messenger of Trampa.

I already had to say that the Minister of Defense and Directors of Intelligence, appointed by Trump, are the most incompetent in the history of the country. But what can be said about the National Security Advisor and the Secretary of State? Volts was a member of the Congress, Rubio before becoming a Secretary of State, for two years was the deputy chairman of the Senate Committee for Intelligence. None of them understands where the military plans can be discussed? It does not occur to any of them to check who is participating in the chat? What are their assistants, if these people at all, or after all the dismissals of the name of Ilon Mask, neither in the White House, in the Pentagon, nor in the State Department, there were no professionals left at all who understand how to ensure the work of their superiors?

When Hillary Clinton, being a Secretary of State, sent a certain number of minor emails from a personal address, the Republicans rolled a scandal that did not subside for several years. The same Rubio and Volts, being members of the Congress, talked about the incompetence and negligence of Clinton, and Highset, being the leading of the Fox channel, called for Clinton to hold the Clinton accountable. And now these people calmly exchange a sensitive and obviously secret information in a completely inappropriate way, with the help of absolutely not intended for such an exchange of technical means, they also invite a journalist to witness their exchange.

Trump said on Tuesday that everything was fine, there was no secret information there, hegset does an outstanding job, and journalist Goldberg was to blame for everything.

Gabbard and Rutcliffe, who, by coincidence, participated on Tuesday in the hearings in the Senate Intelligence Committee in connection with the publication of the annual reconnaissance report on the threats of the US national security, also said that everything was fine and that they could not remember whether they could be in the chat an exchange of secret information (they could not remember what they did two weeks ago, trust the leadership of intelligence? Rutcliffe, so be it, made a favor, said that the invitation to the journalist’s chat was a mistake, but everything else was within the framework of the norms and rules.

The leader of the Democrats in the House of Representatives of Jeffris sent Trump a letter in which he demanded to dismiss the "

It is clear that Trump will not fire him. Dismissed by Trump’s administration for incompetence, for the dissemination of information constituting a state secret, no one can be. Dismissed from this administration can only be for the manifestation of disloyalty to the 47th president. Therefore, the main thing is to repeat daily, as great Trump, as soon as he can do this and this, and all in the world. And then you will not have problems. Even if you invite a journalist to a chat to discuss a military attack on an international terrorist organization. Even if you discuss the details of this attack with the help of completely unacceptable technical means.

Incompetence, negligence, and even worse - the warlike construction of incomplete and negligence to the rank of benefactors is a sad and very disturbing reality of today's America.

Until the end of the story called "

Thanks to everyone who read. Protect yourself and your loved ones. Take care of each other, help each other. Health to everyone.

Ultimately what is happening in the world depends on us.

From whether we are fighting with evil, do good, whether we are just observers, whether we are waiting for passively and believe that someone will decide something for us somewhere, or fight with evil and do everything possible to win the good.

We must not allow evil to win. The victory of evil will mean the end of the world in which we live. We must not allow this. Especially now.

Ukrainian friends, I am loving you love you. Take one one, I ask you.

Ukrainian.

And evil is grinding that to the sign. I was not.




Add a comment
:D :lol: :-) ;-) 8) :-| :-* :oops: :sad: :cry: :o :-? :-x :eek: :zzz :P :roll: :sigh:
 Enter the correct answer