Recently a conversation arose about reading books in general. During the conversation I had to make a lot of efforts to remember when the last time I had to hold the hardcover book and nothing really happened. One can argue that it was a very long time. Most of the texts read in recent years - in electronic form. But about 30 years ago a good book was a welcome gift for a birthday. They even signed as a gift. Something elusive left with a paper book. Probably, this is the initial impulse to read something concrete. Now the process of changing the read text takes a few clicks and if something did not like, then with a topic on the topic you can jump almost instantly. With the book, in the old days, this number did not pass. It had to be "gotten" and if there was not exactly what I wanted, most often, I read to the end, because the search for the next book was like a detective. Probably, many remember how in the soviet apartments in the most prominent place there were sets, crystal and rows of books. Those times have sunk into oblivion and it is correct. But along with them, the process of searching for a specific book.

In those days the author managed to get two books, or rather several volumes of one and a weighty volume of another, with an interval of 10 years. The first book turned out to be bought quite easily, and the second one - for a large amount of trouble. Their authors and the content itself are diametrically opposed in everything, but united their present time, which placed in places what it says and pointed out the fallacy of the judgments of the famous authors. Their names are known to any educated person, like the names of these famous books.

The first of them, performed in several thick volumes - "Capital" by Karl Marx. She had to read at a fairly young age and many things were not understood. But what we could understand was enough to easily escape from the numerous Komsomol leaders who themselves never read either Lenin or Marx, and in the army this was the only cure for the political deputies. Small quotations produced a stunning effect and the incoming zampolit was stupefied and nervously made a mouth like a fish thrown ashore. Later, higher education presupposed the passing of exams on Marxist-Leninist philosophy and political economy, where small quotes from this book were also useful.

In this case, we are interested in the fact that Karl Marx considered capitalism to be a passing system that would go evolutionarily or revolutionary to socialism and communism. Moreover, his theory was that power-holders would resist the progressive movement and, most likely, the transition to a new socio-political formation would take place in a violent, revolutionary way. At the same time, he assumed the inevitability of this process in view of the fact that developed capitalism will increase the number, organization and self-consciousness of the working class, which will unite into a single force and become capable of overthrowing the capitalist regimes. The most interesting is that the theory presupposed the emergence of a revolutionary situation where capitalism is the most developed - in England, France or Germany, and he referred Russia to countries where there can not be a revolution or if there is, then very late in the last ranks of revolutions in Other, more developed countries.

In principle, his theory was futuristic enough, but it looked rather harmonious and logical. Strictly speaking, this work was written half a century before the first class revolution, and therefore to look for five decades ahead is not a simple matter. And one more detail, Marx was a Jew and because of his theories there was a rather cautious attitude. As a result, many of Marx's calculations have found their confirmation, but he obviously did not take into account something, because he did not have a part in the predictions. It was Russia that became the country where the class revolution took place, or rather - a coup. Although the coup itself could hardly be called a consequence of the class struggle, but further developments developed precisely according to the principles of the class struggle.

So the great work of the classic of the theory of the class struggle proved to be rather controversial, in terms of the theoretical aspects of the development of socio-political relations, on a global scale, and in Russia's attitude he was completely mistaken.

The second book is "Mein Kampf," written by Adolph Aloyzych Hitler. This book fell into my hands at the end of a scoop. It was a thick black volume, without a single letter on the cover. The name was written only inside, on the first page. This work turned out to be a complete antipode of Capital and it was clear from the text that its author has a completely different level of education and intelligence. And if the first book was written by a technocrat, then the second one is a self-taught mystic.

It became known later that the future Fuhrer was influenced by famous researchers such as Guido von List, Karl Haushofer and others. He translated their ideas into the foundation of his theory, and then went on to the "current moment" showing how historical excursions into the wilds of Aryanism and other arguments about the purity of blood are reflected in modern processes.

Strictly speaking, everyone has heard about the purity of blood, in terms of Nazi theory, and the films remember the expression "purebred Aryan". If this problem is at the forefront, then the author had to describe the origins of this purest blood, and then what diluted or clogged it. As for the origins, there is absolutely nothing to discuss, for all of this we are now observing in the performance of theorists and supporters of the "Russian world". Sasha Dugin and other dumbbells did not even invent anything special, they just decided that the Aryans were not Germans and their ancestors, and the ancestors of the blunderers, who now undeservedly call themselves Russians. I would not be surprised if in the personal affairs of the current Russian rulers something is written: "a true Aryan, a Nordic character". That is, Duginy, simply wrote off this part from Hitler's Parthenogenesis and uses this idea under a new name. The Third Reich became the Third Rome, and the Millennial Reich - Millennial Russia. Although it looked like Hitler's fanciful fairy tale, densely sitting on merrifying mushrooms, but still a fairy tale is interesting, then Dugin's artifacts with his Arkaim, cause interest only in individuals who do not have a profile education and consciousness, flattened by their own greatness, for example, Zadornov or Putin.

But let's return to Aloyzych. In his theory, the purity of the Nordic race is due to her blood, not diluted by the blood of the lower races. Moreover, Hitler assumed that even the purest Aryans who make up the basis of the nation are not clean enough to return to their sources and acquire superhuman abilities, such as to become immortal, to receive the gift of clairvoyance and the equally useful gift of getting moonshine from any product , By certain passes and by imposing hands. It is known that the famous Aneneerbe-SS expedition to Tibet was sent for the recipe for obtaining schnapps even from minerals.

It was this fundamental assumption that was the basis of the racial theory that later developed and brought to logical absurdity Alfred Rosenberg. That is, on the one hand, the Nazis cleared the blood of thoroughbred Aryans, receiving offspring from specially selected couples, and on the other - fought with those "subhuman" who carried a destructive potential and whose sole purpose was dilution and destruction of Aryan blood. Since they are not capable of creation, they arrange their survival by parasitizing other nations, which they squeezed to the last drop or until death.

As now everyone knows, the role of these destroyers Adolf Aloyzych recorded the Jews. But the unfounded assertion was not enough, for Jesus Christos is a Jew, all his apostles are Jews, and Jesus preached his own sermons in the Aramaic language and exclusively for the Jews. Since Hitler did not completely sack the Christian church, rightly believing that eventually she assimilated (the Orthodox took the "new order" instantly and throughout the occupied territory of the scoop) and become a part of the new religion, it was necessary to clarify her statements about the Jews.

And here he stepped on the rake, which flew and Karl Marx. What is characteristic, Hitler cited the example of the Jew Marx and his theory of the class struggle, as confirmation of the destructive role of the Jews. As an example of the practical application of Marx's theory, Hitler led Bolshevik Russia, where he colorfully described the horrors that the Bolsheviks had brought to the population. By the way, Hitler wrote precisely about the terror of the Bolsheviks quite in detail and in the matter, but he justified all this by the fact that almost all the leadership of the Bolsheviks were Jews: Lenin himself (half-blood), Trotsky, Sverdlov and other theorists of Bolshevism.

But, like Marx, Hitler did not go into the generalizations and did not take into account other, more essential things. For example, he did not bother to study the question of active participation in the formation of Bolshevism of representatives of other nationalities. Later, he could feel it on his own skin, when he entered into a correspondence fight with Georgy Dzhugashvili. By the way, Stalin himself let the Jews under the knife with as much zeal as Hitler, just not so pedantically. But it was already after 1925, when the book was published. In this year, Stalin has not yet reached the pinnacle of power, and therefore Hitler could not yet foresee many events.

The very population of the shovel Hitler considered mortally affected by Jewry and therefore irretrievably lost for purebred nations. In short, he wrote off all the woes of Bolshevik Russia to the intrigues of the Jews entrenched in her.

And then years have passed. Jews massively left many countries in order to create their own, mono-national state. This principle can be treated as anything, but what is important to us is what they created for themselves in their own country. As it turned out, they are able to create a high-tech and highly intelligent state based on its own resources. They managed to create a socio-political system that can easily be viewed from the outside and every time to make sure that Hitler was deeply wrong not only in the priority of clean blood, but also in what is considered to be its polluter. For the Jews have built their own country no worse, and in many ways better than the others. No destructive potential has turned Israel into a world cesspool and a place from which it makes nausea.

And on the contrary, Russia, which Hitler considered a victim of Jewish rule, demonstrates the epicenter of destructive potential. The Russians were not going to bring their huge country into such a kind that at least it was not ashamed of it. Here it's not even in size, but in the population. Canada has an even larger territory, relative to the population. It is located in the same climatic zone as Russia, but where Canada and where Russia. There is no question of blood, because to seek out nibelungs among Russians is useless by definition. So it's not a matter of climate and size, but of the population. All these horrors, which they created do, do independently and continuously. Moreover, the practice showed that they relax a little when they get into the hands of the prey on which they live or parasitize. As soon as it ends, they are bound to rush to the land, which somebody already arranged and led them into a divine appearance. They understand that the devastation that they successfully approved in their country, it is desirable not to notice and push aside, and they want to live in a clean and cozy place that someone created before them. They take it there, but they live as they do on their tattered homeland and after a time they kill a once-blossoming place. If there is no prey or the ability to parasitize at least on something, such as oil, they are dragged on.

This is their historical trait. The leadership certainly wants to have a place of residence in decent countries, and the mob wants to move on, where there are conveniences. Right now it is happening in the Crimea, where the inhabitants of the Russian outback move in massively. The same is true in Donetsk. They want to seize a new place in order to live there and crap until they kill him.

So the classics of communism and National Socialism, with all the colors and differences of their theories, in one turned out to be similar.

Russia, as an example of the operation of their theories, deceived them completely. They were mistaken in what she is like. If they had the gift to see for decades ahead, they would never have written their books and as a consequence, there would not have been so many victims.

Editorial site is not responsible for the content of blogs. The editorial opinion may differ from the author's.

Join the groups "Browser Blogs" on Facebook and VKontakte, stay tuned!.