Less than a day after the resignation of Natalia Poklonskaya from the post of Deputy Head of Rossotrudnichestvo, she was already appointed to a new position - Advisor to the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation.

As in the case of her previous “fluctuations” away from the general line of the authorities, Natalya Poklonskaya escaped with a slight fright: her bureaucratic career did not stop, she remained in the “cage”. However, this time - at the cost of refusing publicity and silence.

But the reason for the new reshuffle turned out to be more than serious: Poklonskaya actually refused to publicly admit that war is peace and dared to express sympathy for the victims of Russian aggression - those whom she betrayed in 2014, her former compatriots.

I think that any other Russian official who would dare to express her opinion in this way would lose not only her position, but also the royal goodwill.. And, perhaps, she would have been under investigation for some real or imaginary corruption offenses - as you know, you still need to look for such a fighter against corruption as Vladimir Putin. But Poklonskaya received another sinecure - I wonder why?

Perhaps, in the minds of Russian officials, she remains too bright a propaganda image of the “Crimean spring” to publicly sacrifice the very figure of Poklonskaya and turn her into a traitor to the idea of \u200b\u200bdestroying Ukraine.. After all, Poklonskaya's previous appointments, I'm sure, were a sinecure. What does the Prosecutor of the occupied Crimea decide Only what the leader from Moscow orders. What does the deputy of the State Duma decide Only what the curator from the presidential administration will say. What could Poklonskaya decide in Rossotrudnichestvo? Never mind. This organization is just a "

And in the General Prosecutor's Office of Russia, Poklonskaya, it seems, will only be listed. I would even say - " I think the Russian leadership will just look at how correctly she understood the order to be silent - in order to decide whether it is possible to appoint the former head of the occupation prosecutor's office of Crimea to some more serious position. However, officially the reason for the new appointment of Poklonskaya is not mentioned anywhere..

The problem with Natalia Poklonskaya – like with some other collaborators of the 2014 model – is that she is used to the traditions of Ukrainian politics, where there was space for expressing one’s own opinion even during the time of Viktor Yanukovych. A deputy of the Verkhovna Rada from the Party of Regions could play with having his own opinion - if, of course, he had this own opinion. Of course, so as not to offend the authorities. So Poklonskaya, apparently, believed that if she already played in Moscow as a fan of the last Russian emperor, then this should not offend anyone. And if she expresses sorrow in connection with the human victims, then this should not hurt anyone either.. After all, she comes from Ukraine, why not sympathize with the unfortunate people.

But Russian politics is not a farce, but a barracks. And if they said that the film is approved, then it is approved..

And if they said that war is peace, then no one should sympathize with anyone. Moreover, an official from the notorious Rossotrudnichestvo.

Well, how much Poklonskaya is actually against the war, how much she really sympathizes with someone, I think you can understand at least by the fact that she agreed to remain silent, exchanged empathy for another meaningless position, agreed that serving the Kremlin is much more important.

What, in fact, was required to prove.