The Security Service of Ukraine announced a new suspicion to the former Minister of Education of Ukraine Dmitry Tabachnik in cooperation with the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation and involvement in robberies in the occupied territories of the Zaporozhye region.
Investigators have established that Tabachnik, who had previously been declared suspected of treason against Ukraine, is in direct contact with Oleg Kozlov, a staff member of the 9th Directorate of the Department of Operational Information of the 5th FSB Service.. In particular, after the full-scale Russian invasion, he coordinated with him his subversive activities against Ukraine.
In particular, Tabachnik took an active part in organizing pseudo-referendums in the occupied regions of Kherson and Zaporozhye regions and personally carried out the tasks of the Kremlin to “reformat” the educational and medical industries of the occupied regions to the needs of the aggressor country.. It was under the coordination of Tabachnik that most of the educational institutions and hospitals in the region were converted into barracks for the occupation groups of the Russian Federation. The traitor carried out all these "
As the intelligence service found out, in order to give Tabachnik " He was also included in the local cell of the Kremlin party "
The SBU also reported that Tabachnik was also involved in the looting of the property of Melitopol residents.. Together with Murad Saidov, the so-called supervisor of the region from Kadyrov, in April last year they organized the export of agricultural machinery to Crimea from the warehouses of a local agricultural holding.
Based on the collected evidence, Tabachnik was additionally notified of suspicion under two articles of the Criminal Code of Ukraine:.
st. 111-2 (Aiding the Aggressor State);
st. 438 (violation of the laws and customs of war).
[see_also ids\u003d"
Recall that in November 2022, the SBU informed Dmitry Tabachnik about suspicion of. 2 st. 111 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (state treason committed under martial law). Subsequently, the court seized the defendant's property for a total amount of more than 2 million. dol.