Ukraine needs 60 long-range multiple rocket launchers to stop Russian advance. This opinion was expressed by Advisor to the Head of the Office of the President Alexei Arestovich in an interview with The Guardian..

According to the representative of the authorities, the number of MLRS that the Armed Forces of Ukraine received from the Western allies at the moment is not enough to seriously change the course of events on the battlefield.

“If we get 60 of these systems, then the Russian troops will be completely stopped and will not be able to advance in any direction.. If 40, then they will slow down significantly, suffering heavy losses.. If 20, then they will advance further, but with greater losses than now. The less we get, the worse for us. Our troops will continue to die, and we will lose positions,” Arestovich said..

Recall that last week the United States agreed to provide Ukraine with a new package of military assistance, which included HIMARS missile systems, and on the eve of the head of the British Ministry of Defense announced the transfer of the M270 MLRS.

[see_also ids\u003d"

Earlier, the former US ambassador to Kyiv said that Ukraine has the right to shoot at Russian artillery even if it is located on the territory of the Russian Federation..

Should Ukraine seek international recognition of Russia as a terrorist state Or maybe better a state sponsor of terrorism? What is the difference between these terms, and is it generally worth it for Ukraine to spend time and energy on this direction of the fight against the Russian Federation? Read the article by Gunduz Mammadov "