Our authorities not only start repairing roads in early summer, drivers have also created problems by banning traffic jams. But this silovikam seemed a little - representatives of the Prosecutor General's Office appeared with a search to the telecom company "Olli Trans" and seized part of the servers, which contained the data of the project "Video Fixes".

Now the company has to notify its users when the project will function in normal mode.

"Dear users of the project" Video Jams "! We receive from you many letters with the question "Why did the traffic cameras cease to work?" - says the appeal of "Olli Trans". - Indeed, some of the cameras do not work due to the removal of servers. The company was searched by the GPU. The reason for the search and seizure of the technical equipment of the project "Videoprobki" was the investigation of the events of the Revolution of Virtue and the need for the investigation to obtain video recordings of 3 years ago from the traffic cameras of our project, which could, according to the investigation, help in the investigation of these tragic events ".

In "Olli Trans" they stated that they had repeatedly provided, upon request of various law enforcement agencies, records from the road cameras of the project "Video Fixes", which are relevant to these events. Therefore, they do not understand why it was necessary to conduct such hard investigative actions, which in turn led to the blocking of the technical resources of the road video surveillance project.

Now the company buys new servers at its own expense, apparently not relying on the prompt return of its assets. "In the near future we plan to restore the broadcast of your favorite cameras after purchasing and setting up the necessary equipment," the appeal says..

Behind the scenes there were rhetorical questions:.

Why are representatives of the Prosecutor General's Office unable to send a request with a request to provide the necessary information to the investigation or at least copy this data?.

Why are companies that are UNAUTHORIZED in committing crimes, but only possessing information about possible violations, must incur significant losses and actually pay for the bearish errors of the investigation? (For some reason, it is difficult to imagine a situation where a deputy or an official who witnessed a crime and recorded a video on his phone, seizes a gadget for several years to carry out an examination.

And the proposal to provide a copy - "correctly" sent to "no opportunity").

When the siloviki compensate for the damage to companies, their counterparties and subscribers?.

Why law enforcement, who in theory should be a model for the implementation of laws, in practice roughly spit on them?.

Why have not any of the servicemen been punished for unsubstantiated searches so far, despite the loud statements of the highest authorities of the state?.