Fakhіvtsі chanted the bell between the sprouts of the sights of meat and the development of unsafe ailments.

Chotiri meta-analyses, in which data were collected on six million people, did not confirm the connection between the intake of red and processed meat and mortality from both causes, as well as the risk of the adoption of cancerous fluff. The article was published in Annals of Internal Medicine, inform Ukr. Media.

Several years ago, scientists from the International Agency for the Fight against Cancer conducted a large-scale study, which showed that a serving of 50 grams of processed meat per day for 18 hours increased the risk of developing rectal cancer. Also, there are manifestations of interrelationships between the survival of processed meat and equal illness with other types of cancer.

On the basis of the research conducted in 10 countries, processed meat was insured to a group of confirmed carcinogens. However, anonymous other studies did not know any correlation between meat and cancer diseases.

To be included in the diet of meat for humans and its carcinogenicity, scientists from eight countries created the last NutriRECS consortium. The contributors analyzed an array of articles about the infusion of red and processed meat.

Stats were taken from four different databases, starting from the moment they appeared up to and including the 2018 rainfall. Smoked meat, salted and dried meat were brought before the processed meat, as well as meat products with additional preservatives and the term saving no less than beer. An hour later, the analysis of the disease did not reveal a statistically significant correlation between the development of meat and the development of cancerous, cardiovascular and other diseases.

Povna or chastkova vіdmova vіd tsikh raznovidіv meat can slightly (on lіchenі chastki vіdsotka) reduce the risk of the appearance of fluff.

Based on the results of the meta-analysis, the contributors recommended that everyone save red and processed meat, so as not to supersede their ethical views.

The authors of the work indicate that the behavior of the last ones could have influenced the results. Vcheni do not include the possibility of the fact that people could lie about their diet through the power of giving socially acceptable opinions, or just forgetting about the details.

aspect. net.