Everton, Manchester City, Chelsea and the new era of financial fair play in the Premier League

22 November 2023, 13:13 | Football
theathletic.com
Text Size:

Wild Sunset or the English Premier League went the wrong way with financial fair play.

At such an hour, perhaps, the brightest point will be the words of Ivan Gazidis, who, after eight years of work as the deputy commissioner of the American League MLS, was shocked by having played in the English Premier League at the Yakost. Vikon's Director of the Arsenal.

“This is a little bit like Wild Zahid,” Gazidis said on the cob of 2009 rock. “I teach here those things that are unacceptable in US sports leagues”.

Historically, it has been the case that English football has not shown any particular interest in the harsh rules of the Volodymyr club, its losses, home-grown gravels and much more.. The former UEFA President Michel Platini praised the “great liberalism” for turning the Premier League into a gaming platform for billionaires, and practically everything is a waste of money that is supported by nafta pennies in Chelsea and Manchester. these are the positive cash that the Americans owe at Manchester United and Liverpool, docks.

Until Friday afternoon (leaf fall on the 17th) there will be a rise if the Premier League club spends points. In fact, this is one of more than five losses in the history of England's top division: Sunderland - two points for fielding an unregistered player in the 1890/91 season, Arsenal - two points and Manchester United - one point for fielding an unregistered player in the 1890/91 season. seasons. and now Everton - 10 points for the 2023/24 season for violating the financial fair play rules.

Over the past decade or so, we have learned:.

- FIFA stopped Chelsea from signing players in 2019 after breaking the rules at the time of signing young players;

- In 2014, Manchester City succumbed to sanctions from UEFA for violating financial fair play rules, and as a result, a series of calls appeared from their financial authorities, which led to further investigation no, in the course of some “rebellion” they were fined 8;

- Sunderland fined a six-figure sum for allowing an unregistered player onto the field (fellow Korean striker Ji Dong-won, who played several matches without a work permit in England);

- Bournemouth, Leicester and QPR were sanctioned for violating financial rules during the transition to the Premier League;

- In 2017, Watford fined ?4.3 million after Rafaele Riva, the club's then head, submitted a detailed bank guarantee, which stated that the authorities had sufficient resources to funding for the club during the advertising campaign that was launched. Later, Riva was also fined and disqualified;

- Liverpool paid Manchester City ?1 million after their Premier League rivals swindled the evils of their scouting system;

- Manchester United were unable to play their home match against Liverpool due to the demonstration of local fans;

- Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United and Tottenham were fined 22 million pounds sterling for their participation in the failed Super League project, which posed a real threat to club football;

- Over the past few years, new problems have emerged in the financial woes of Chelsea under the rule of Roman Abramovich.

Whatever we didn’t learn from 2010 rock and dosi, we got a point in the English Premier League.

However, if West Gem fined ?5.5 million for violating the rules of the Volodymyr third parties, who signed Carlos Tevez and Javier Mascherano (their contracts were with external investors, not the club), what is wrong what allowed the “hammers” to lose.

This tells Rozmov and Kerivnik the club about ten years ago, since the rights and shortcomings of Sunderland were discussed. \? " “We really want the tournament table to be covered with stars, because five or six clubs would be penalized by a point?

The greedy star is now on the scene, and it has dropped Everton five positions down, right into the villota zone. Ikhnyy evil? The breakdown of the financial rules of fair play of the Premier League during the three-year period, which will end in the 2021/22 season. Zokrema, according to the independent commission, the club exceeded the allowance for the excess in the amount of 19.5 million pounds and gave inaccurate information about the costs of financing the stadium.

# 18 LISTOPADA 2023 M V N P ZAB ABOUT RIZN O 1 Manchester City 12 9 1 2 32 12 20 28 2 Liverpool 12 8 3 1 27 10 17 27 3 Arsenal 12 8 3 1 26 10 16 27 4 Tottenham 12 8 2 2 24. What is the financial management and accounting of such a scale (excess of 19.5 million pounds more than allowed for the three-year period, stretching out which club finished in the 12th, 10th and 16th) is truly the worst evil, anyway Premier League club? New addition to English football?

This is legitimate food, as the clubs that were relegated from the Premier League during that period may have the right to feel insulted by the fact that Everton, having broken the rules, lost their money for them.

Eerton, Yaky Azrazu, stirring about the fuel namir, calling the plot of the unjust-in-laws, he was unjust, having gone, stinking with great izhitima behind the roshenes, brought in the same vipado rules.

So we will be different from each other. It is noteworthy that the calls made against Manchester City by the German newspaper Der Spiegel at the fall of the leaves in 2018 have now led to courtyard suspense due to participation in UEFA tournaments in the bitter 2020, which is in five months syatsiv was ruled by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) - no longer. Manchester City confirms the decision to steal your call, otherwise the decision has not yet been praised.

On the right side of Everton, it was important that the committee could meet and make a verdict before the end of last season - as such clubs as Southampton, Leeds and Leicester asked for, which flew to the Championship - it is not surprising that on the right side is Manchester City Everything that includes.

All the incidents from the incredible destruction at the side of Manchester City date back to the 2009/10 season. Over the past period, they have gone from a chaotic club with a wealthy and ambitious leader to a dominant force in English and European football, having won the Premier League once (including five of the remaining six seasons), and the English Cup. ii, six times the English League Cup and once.

This year, Manchester City reported a river revenue of 712.8 million pounds sterling, which is a record for English football, and still loses 115 undivided meals about those who were currently playing sports The empire was brought into compliance with the rules. The club will deny any wrongdoing, but the CAS rumors at the time of 2020 have not left doubts about the validity of the stolen electronic sheets published by Der Spiegel, which said that the “locals” were breaking the rules. Sita's legal team noted the usefulness of the leaves on the skin, the kidney in UEFA, and, most importantly, in the Premier League.

What is the matter with Chelsea, they can’t remember the reports that were published in various newspapers in the past years due to payments apparently made to various third-party companies that belong to Abramovich, as well as other parties m, connected with the pleasures, which, perhaps, brought benefits to the club.

This information was part of the Cypriot Privacy Project, based on 3.6 million offshore records collected by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and the German newspaper Paper Trail Media. Chelsea state that the calls “are based on documents that have not been presented to the club and there are no contacts with any individual who is currently in the club.”. The Blues' new bosses have already contacted UEFA, the Premier League and the FA in order to alert them to unconventional financial information regarding various transactions under the management of Abramovich in the period 20 12 to 2019 r_k.

How English football appeared like this? Honestly speaking, all this is due to the flattening of the eyes, allowing the culture of the famous Wild Sunset to establish itself. This allowed the clubs to be bought by individuals and legal entities, about which the Premier League knew little and nothing at all - and whose business waters were trying to make sure they fit together, without seeming to be about regulation.

And this takes us to Everton. Unregardless of all the widespread sympathy that many people feel who gets a point from the drive, regardless of all the instinct “against the whole world” that has hoarded their fans, according to the image that patients feel, as before, perhaps try the dirty, dark method,.

This commission is reinforced by a number of unacceptable truths, which fans repeated when it came to the need to change the system, and not about sanctions: 1) immediate management of the legacy of great expenses; 2) recklessness in the extended signing of the graves in 2021–2022, regardless of the multiple advances on the side of the Premier League; 3) a business plan that relied so heavily on the generosity of the company USM Services Limited, which is registered in the British Virgin Islands and belongs to Alisher Usmanov, one of the oligarchs who were sanctioned by the UK after the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

I remember again, how English football appeared like this? I know again, my eyes are rolling and I convince myself that even pennies are good pennies, rarely ceasing to worry about what incidents may arise from them.

There are a lot of clubs, both through leaders and sponsors. There is also a problem with English football: too many hours are spent on hoarding the talents that are on display in the Premier League, and not enough time is spent thinking about those who do not become an uncoated game, buried by other people who have the power to go beyond the boundaries. ї seizure control.

Enough, but the rules were clearly broken by the strengthening of the rules. There are stinks against the interruption of English football.

For many years, Premier League clubs saw UEFA's initiative on financial rules as an attempt to smear the wings.. Just like quotas for home-grown gravel. It was not appropriate for the active English lords of the old union, who had nothing similar to Abramovich’s deep casings, when they were told that their club could not recognize great beatings from rock to river. This loss of financial well-being was anathema to the rich.

The singing sense is getting better. Who still cares that the accounting system is not to blame but partly for football. Why, after 125 years, English clubs were told that stinkers could spend pennies more at the singing boundaries? How many people want to finance the club, but not on the right?

The beginnings of financial fair play seemed noble. However, the version that came to light after the most successful European clubs were revealed turned out to be deeply compromised and mired. The past decade has demonstrated the value of.

Ale tse I know that very Wild Zahid. Zokrema, at the Premier League, the sums that we are talking about went out of control, some clubs went from local businessmen to anyone, from Russian oligarchs to American venture capitalists and others Some sovereign wealth funds. This led to chaos and instability, the fragments of the stake became even greater.

Think about how Everton squandered their resources in the period from 2016 to 2022, and now consider how the ruler Farhad Moshiri could have recklessly squandered his pennies, as if there were no financial rules that needed to be followed hang on, don’t stop and don’t be too harsh.

Vlasnik and members of the Everton board were defeated. They were already close to the 2020 deadline when, despite some of their competitors, and also because their income streams were seriously disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, they signed Ben Godfrey, Allan and Abdoulaye Doucure and James Rodriguez, adding to.

Part of Everton's defense was based on the fact that the new skin treatment that was applied to the 2021/22 season was little praised by the Premier League, apparently to the minds of the season.. Lisa has stated that she has consistently stated that she does not manage Everton's finances and that the club can ensure that the target's profitability is achieved..

It reads like this: these dads are trying to teach their kids not to spend all their money at the candy store. The cream of Everton's transfer business under the leadership of Moshiri, it seems that satisfaction has rarely lasted so long, like a tide of blood.

This is the craziest thing about the match with Everton: all the supernatural expenditures that the club recognized as a serious player brought to even a small wine town. This place at the first time under the leadership of Ronald Koeman in the 2016/17 season is deprived of Everton's best result since Moshiri added to the " Since then, the stench has not gone away until the quarter-finals of the Water Cup tournament. Taking 10 points from anyone from the remaining two seasons spent fighting against Wilot would have taken over their share.

In what way? Judging by their recent results under the management of Sean Dyche and the difficult teams that have lost promotion, they will probably have everything.

Wine nutrition about the sports benefits of Everton's vitrat. This commission says that a club that breaks the rules will inevitably gain advantages that it would not otherwise have, and that this advantage will be a disadvantage to competing clubs, which are more likely to maintain their with their finances. It is also possible that the sanctions guarantee that a club that has broken the rules will not save the profit for the destruction of other clubs and guilty activities as a driving factor for clubs that may be reluctant to break the rules in the future.

And so inevitably there is a story about what sanctions may be imposed on Manchester City, since they will be found guilty of at least one of the 115 transferred offenses, as well as in Chelsea, since the “blues” will be transferred to the commission ii. It seems that it is not good to fade about the price. Since this new aggressive approach is a step forward for the Premier League, the process can be difficult to figure out, especially when it comes to sporting benefits.

There are already a lot of rumors about how the Premier League opened the almighty can of troubles, stirred up a wasp’s nest and cried out for the chaos that seems inevitable, since it meant that a ruin, similar to that of Everton, deserves to be removed 10 points.



Some participants are asking that the Premier League is not embroiled in a series of bloody battles, and that it is not winning, trying to show strength while the government of Great Britain is trying to create a powerful football regulatory body.

Another alternative is to simply follow the path of the least support.. And it doesn’t look like an option anymore. As far as the rules are concerned, they must be followed carefully to ensure the integrity of the product.. Otherwise it will be true Wild Zahid.

From The Athletic.

Based on materials: theathletic.com



Add a comment
:D :lol: :-) ;-) 8) :-| :-* :oops: :sad: :cry: :o :-? :-x :eek: :zzz :P :roll: :sigh:
 Enter the correct answer