The head coach took advantage of the controversial refereeing decisions in Minaya's matches.

Menay even more often in this season of dissatisfaction with judicial decisions, as they call for plenty of food. The head coach of the team, Volodymyr Sharan, picked up the most flashy aspects of judging.

“It’s a great pity that I don’t remember when it was possible to sit and examine the decisions of arbitrators in such a manner. I've been thinking about what experts and journalists might tackle. I can see it better. When the time has come to talk about it.

I looked at all the super funny moments from the matches of nine rounds. It seems to me that not one of the UPL teams will be “placed” by the referee in the same way as before Minayu. And here we are talking only about flashy effective reprieves. Why, two of them were recognized by the Committee of Arbitrators. The axis is only for us from this fact, there is no core. You can't turn the point around either. It turns out that we can only be satisfied with the fact that they malfunctioned if they appealed to the arbitrators. We also don’t care about sanctions before the courts. The committee recognizes their pardons, and the UAF orders them to proceed with the upcoming tour,” quote Sharan from the club’s official website.

I have returned to the Committee of Arbitrators with requests for a more detailed explanation of several controversial episodes, in order to understand that the right decisions were taken on the field, and that the judges in these episodes still allowed pardons.

In an official report to the Committee of Referees, Minaya’s head coach Volodymyr Sharan commented on certain moments.

1st round. Dynamo – Minaj.

85 Khvilina.

Penalty for foul Panasenka vs Dubinchak.

“Already after the referee “knows” from both sides, the weaker team has the moment to call a penalty. At that time the rakhunok was 1:2, there was an intrigue and we had little time to equalize the rakhunok. A very amazing 11-meter shot was assigned in the episode Panasenko-Dubinchak. І price for presence on the VAR group. It was very important for us to play again. Here I get up at two balls and get married at one o’clock.”.

3 round. Minai – Dnipro-1.

42 Khvilina.

Not safe gra Panasenka.

77 Khvilina.

Penalty in the Kravchuk-Tanchik episode.

“The VAR system was also present at the matches.. On the 77th line, the referee didn’t even think of awarding a penalty when Tanchik got into our penalty area. Gravets Dnipra-1 himself did not understand why he himself was awarded a penalty. No one is aware. I was told that Kopievsky would look at the hour without noting anything and saying that the VAR referee recommended that I be more respectful before the episode. Good, then Bandura reacted to the blow.

I want to say that I have no intention of kidnapping my children. Mova about the power of arbitration. In the same game against Dnieper-1, our retired player Sergey Panasenko fully deserved to take away the red card for the game with his foot raised high. This is also a pardon for the arbitrator. I'm talking about the unwise judgment in the sun. There are a lot of critics from all teams. We appeal not only to us. We also read the interview of the head coaches after the Games. And in sports programs there is always more talk about judging. And it hasn’t changed the minds, if VAR machines are present in most countries.”.

4th round. Metalist 1925 – Minai.

71 Khvilina.

Dmitrenok's goal was offside.

" We had to endure bad moments, we could have opened the rakhunok, but we didn’t get rid of our rewards. VAR in this match there were no referees who ruled out a goal from our goal from the position of the game. We knew that we had already covered up the lesions. Painful.

The head referee is Klim Zabroda. And he was appointed as the fourth referee for the match Minaj - Shakhtar, who also had to supply the refereeing team."

Round 6. Minai – Shakhtar.

52 Khvilina.

Foul of Hemp against Tverdokhlib.

65 Khvilina Foul by Sudakov against Ralyuchenko.

" With a score of 0:1 for a foul on Tverdokhlib, the referees had many more reasons to call the point, even in Kiev against Dynamo for an injury to Panasenko’s side. The referee of the game against the " Experts after the game indicated that the penalties were, as it were, “50 to 50”. Ale yakke vіdsotki spіvіdravleniya in the moment with a penalty at our gate in the match against Dynamo?

The same group has little experience with Sudakov. The referee exchanged praise and, after a couple of minutes, Shakhtar’s attacker scored the third goal for us. Moreover, the guests also lost their goal attack due to the violation of the rules - Matvienko, near his own goal, pushed aside Gunichev. Our photographer captured this moment - the hands of the hunter on the shoulders of our attacker. We were about to deny the right to an unsafe penalty kick, but then they denied an attack on our goal and a goal.

Such a shock takes a psychological toll on the boys. The stench did not deserve such a bastard. I am good, because we were not rewarded for nothing, but we were not deserved for a crushing defeat.

It’s really good that after the rude pardon of Dmitry Bondarenok was recognized by the committee of arbitrators, he was appointed to the 7th round. At the match LNZ - \u200b\u200bRukh Vin served as a referee for VAA"

7th round. Oleksandriya – Minai.

"

“A lot of people were killed by Oleksandriya’s goal at our gate already after the final whistle. I don’t understand why Oleksandr Shandor allowed his opponent to vacate that Kutoviy, since the teams exceeded the compensation hour. It's past. And then without allowing the teams to finish the episode and blowing the whistle to end the match. The boys then switched off from the fight and this allowed the Oleksandrians to score. The ball was not secured because the kick came after the whistle.

This episode can be compared with a similar one in 2021, since Oleksandria, as I was going crazy at that hour, played at the finals of the Cup against Zorya. Easter said that he would blow the whistle immediately after the first shot to the ball. Vernidub didn’t sense anyone’s superiority, because I won’t have mercy, having already scored another test. There were a lot of problems, but then the Committee learned that Paschal had made the right decisions. The Committee of Arbitrators immediately said that Sandor had mercy. Perhaps the rules have changed in the interim?

8th round. Polissya – Minai.

45 Khvilina.

Penalty in the episode Tverdokhlib – Kushnirenko.

" I, as Viktor Vatsko said: “the much-suffering Minai again denied a penalty at his own goal. Although I don’t understand where to take my legs Egor Tverdokhlib. Vіn without hitting the gravel, just landing on the lawn after a horse duel. There was a similar moment in the match between Obolon and Poliss, when the “brewers” \u200b\u200bwere awarded a penalty and the team lost 0:2, two players missed an hour in compensation.

The referee did not recognize the penalty, but the VAR system “corrected” the decision. Good, I know that Bandura has read Gritsuk’s idea.”.

9th round. Minai – Obolon.

84, 90+4 hvilini.

Two violations of the rules on the Ship and Tverdokhlib.

" Kazav, what is natural is that there will be no result. Ale, who knows how the match would have ended, Yakby awarded a 11-meter penalty for a foul against Korablin. The committee of referees has already decided that there will be penalties. Those guys who came in as substitutes were charged, strengthened the group and respected their opponent.

Everyone read from ZMI about those who the side referee said to send our graves for an appeal from that episode. This is nonsense. For similar actions in the match against Oleksandriya, Dmitruk was punished with an 11-meter penalty. In Minaya it happened the same way and the referee takes a radically different decision on the field. Another assistant prompts to “send” the gravel... And on the 90th + 4th century, Frost crashed into Tverdokhlib and whitewashed Obolon.. Why do Priymak and Tverdokhlib fight for the ball, and Frost simply beats Tverdokhlib with acceleration and then falls on the lawn with such pain?.

How many moments have I overreacted And this is all those that influenced the results of the matches. I really want the committee of arbitrators to show respect. Skoda and the team, and the president of the club Valeriy Peresolyak, who will do everything possible so that in Transcarpathia there will be football equal to the Premier League. The boys were depressed, not thinking that after the 9th round we would have 3 points. Let us not give up and we will work hard to rectify the situation.

You can create a rule so that the referees determine the share of coaches, clubs, and patients. Because I believe that we can overcome the war and get fans in the stands and can support Minaj herself in the UPL matches.

I can already read comments on the Internet about the swindles of the courts and opinions about the “killing” by the arbitrators. But here's another twist. We know our mercy, we know what we need to work on. Let's understand our formation. Nowadays I just comment on the things I study. Mova about the power of arbitrators. Low brightness.

And in this case, there is no punishment for judges who allowed effective pardons. We understand that the President is dissatisfied with the result, and what our small club expects. Last year we achieved what we deserve in the UPL. This season, in many matches, they demonstrated their strength. Don't let everything lie just before us."

Guess what, earlier Minaj criticized the refereeing of the Obolon Vislov match: “VAR did not come, the referees were not allowed to go.”.