Alexander Ozirny about the moral-willed aspect of the match Dynamo-Shakhtar.

Probably an analogy about the gold medalist from the village who, having entered the university, realized that the smart one, not only he alone, but against some he is not even clever, is not very appropriate and somewhat hasty. Nevertheless, it is not devoid of any logic - Dynamo last couple of matches easily and fun "endured" the clubs are clearly weaker than themselves. It was even like the courage that last stayed in Dynamo for a long time. The miner, on the other hand, resembled a cat of overgrown sour cream, which is even too lazy to drive away flies flying around and periodically biting it.

This context has deceived many - some on courage, gaining form, pleasing the eye - angry and hungry; Others - are lazy and sitting on the shore, waiting, driving a blade of grass from one corner of the mouth to the other, while the corpse of the enemy swims by. If you bet on this match, then I sincerely hope that they were guided not by this logic. That is done, not like I did.

I hope that Sergey Rebrov has read a book about positive thinking and the phrase "There is no pretension" - an attempt to find good in bad. Otherwise, it can be interpreted as a mockery of the fans. Actually, indirectly, he admitted that everything is bad, because in football you can compare all or almost everything, except for self-giving - this is an abstract concept. And then when everything is bad - from zagashnika gets zayuzannaya to the hole phrase about dedication - try, prove the opposite. So know, if someone, losing, talking about a good dedication, then everything else - in a catastrophic state.

Although even talking about the moral-willed qualities (they are self-sufficiency) look ridiculous and ridiculous. There are two principal rivals, one of which, to put it mildly, is destroyed at the tournament distance. And here comes the chance to avenge all grievances. Yes, this is a solution to the local problem - to return to the fight for the championship will not work out, but at least so. The opposite option is to get another portion of humiliation. Is it possible to assume in such a situation that there will be some problems with motivation? Yes you can, but only for Shakhtar, not for Dynamo. Therefore, when Rebrov says that there was self-giving, the question arises: "What could it not be?".

Speaking about the dedication of football players Rebrov, indirectly says that he is guilty (why not say it directly?). After all, if there are no claims to football players for self-sacrifice, then claims to whom? What is the reason for the defeat? There are not so many options - to the coach. The players tried (according to Rebrov), but it did not work out. For the entire match Dynamo twice hit the gate. And this means that Rebrov lost tactically to Fonseque. And this means that the question of the competence of the coach again comes out on top.

Or more accurately continues to keep in the hit parade "The reasons for the failures of Dynamo Kiev" honorable first place.

All written is just a new verbal shell to describe old problems, but Dynamo, read - Igor Surkis, stubbornly does not allow to switch to something else. But it's easy to do it - just invite a coach to Dynamo, the main quality of which will be that he. Coach, and not a former Dynamo player whose heart is sufficiently emanating a white-blue glow giving the right to be called a true Dynamo.

Alexander Osirny, Football. Ua Author: Alexander Ozirnyy.