" Shown on TV. He appropriates nuclear missiles, Donbass, and Crimea... Idiot... Does he think that Sevastopol belongs to him No really... here is the most “democrat”, if he is Russian, he will be against... And how will it be! And you won’t have to take Sevastopol away from Kravchuk, but let him try to “take it”!

The following is the text in the original language. This was the reaction to the vote on September 24, 1991 on the occasion of the restoration of the independence of Ukraine, not of any Zhirinovsky or Zyuganov, but of one of the leading ideologists of Perbudovo, Gorbachov’s aide, historian Anatoly Chernyaev,. Moreover, we are talking about the unequivocal reaction to the independence of Ukraine, confirmed by the document, and not about later reminiscences on this topic.

Anatoly Chernyaev himself was a unique person in the Soviet government structures, and therefore his estimates of the 1970-90s are also unique. His father was an engineer from the homeland of a pre-revolutionary entrepreneur, his mother was a noblewoman after marriage.. Home education gave him more, the lower Soviet school - knowledge of many foreign languages \u200b\u200band artistic literature. I see the illumination of Chernyaev, who began at the Moscow IFL (Institute of Philosophy, Literature and History) in 1938, right after school - Stalin had already set his sights on Europe,. In 1941, the majority of IFL students volunteered to go to the front, having survived the entire war, being wounded several times, rising from private to captain, chief of staff of the battalion (unknown. It seems that they played their role both in their ability to quickly learn all the necessary speeches, including the military law, and in their brilliant physical form, inspired by childhood (from 80 rocks Chernyaev bravely.

Chernyaev’s career in the apparatus of the CPSU Central Committee was very successful. He worked with an international branch who dealt with connections with the communist movement in the world: assistant, deputy head of the department, consultant, manager of a group of consultants, deputy head; 1981-86 - candidate member, 1986-90 - member of the CPSU Central Committee, 1986 - assistant general secretary of the Central Committee, then USSR President M. Gorbachova. Nowadays, the policies of the Soviet leaders are being critically addressed, and his books from 1972-91 (45 rough large-format notebooks with 400 sides) contain unique factual material about the all-out crisis. When Gorbachov became General Secretary, he brought Chernyaev to his “university stake”, and he became the de facto author of the rich new leader of the USSR in the current politics, passing on the paradigm of “a new vision for our land and the whole world”.

In 2003, a number of originals were published, the political part of which had been seen before, the author, having encountered the realities of even early Putinism, transferred the National Security Archive to the National Security Archive in Washington.. For the life of Chernyaev, we are willing to give access to these originals to the descendants. For me, without this strong faith, writing the history of the USSR is simply not possible.

So, from one of the most popular storylines of Chernyaev’s scourges, as an atypical party intellectual and a good friend of important figures in culture, a hater of anti-Semitism and a supporter of rapprochement with the Sunset,.

This line can accommodate three important warehouses:.

Such a vinaigrette, at least super-cheerful. It falls into the eye that nothing of what is addressed to the “Khokhols”, Chernyaev does not allow himself to harm other peoples.

Records of the meetings of the secretariat and plenums of the Central Committee of the Brezhnev hours, in which the author of the book happened to be present, confirm: the Ukrainian Socialist Republic and the Baltic Republics, and Belarus were also “prominent”, those for whose country they lived. Thus, Uzbekistan secured its grains, Kazakhstan secured its harvest in the future, Russia secured oil and gas, and so, as a diva, Moscow constantly urged itself, through its Kiev Gauleiters, not to get bogged down in. Well, in the wake of the holiday, when energy prices fell sharply, which led to a minimum foreign exchange supply, when the short-lived anti-alcohol campaign led to the collapse of wine and juice production (vineyards were destroyed), when. Axis is a fragment of a meeting of the Politburo of the CPSU Central Committee recorded by Chernyaev (early 1987): “Biryukova. The output republics - Ukraine and the Baltic states - do not want to increase production rates. For what? We supposedly have enough! Gorbachev. Press them through raw materials and energy. And give standards. Let them live! Biryukova. If something happens, stop the enterprises...\? “Our socialist empire,” as Gorbachev called the Soviet Union more than once, has not been ignored. Prote had a chance to realize that Ukraine was great and important, but Lithuania’s power and energy were cut off, as the 1990s brought independence to life. Didn't help. And from Ukraine they gave a big pig - they stopped providing equipment purchased at Zakhod for the modernization of the industry, transferring all over Russia. Chi helped?

We have the utmost respect for those here - who are at the bottom of other crises - and we are convinced that Moscow is afraid of the reaction of the URSR. Even more notable were such fears at the Politburo meeting on the 9th of the same year, at the hour of discussing the “Criminal Tatar problem”, when the party elite was looking for ways to reliably block the turnaround.. Most of it was based on the fact that the trace would have to be turned to the warehouse of the Russian Empire, in order to earn? Gorbachov stated: “You think that Crimea should again become part of the RSFSR, as by Lenin’s decree? Probably, from a historical and political point of view, it would be correct to return Crimea to Russia. But Ukraine will rise up as a mountain" And the protective member of the Politburo, Vorotnikov, said: “How would we not create another huge Ukrainian problem?”. Finally, Moscow found the right option: the creation of the Crimean Autonomy at the warehouse of Ukraine, not the Crimean Tatars, but de facto the Russians.

The competence of the assistant secretary general/president on Ukrainian issues is evident from this fragment of the author, where the leader of the independents called the “People’s Front”, which held a rally near Kharkov, at which they waved “yellow-white flags”. And at the same time - the following entry: " Saturday. Yesterday: Kyiv, Kohl and Co.. The city itself... I haven’t been there for 35 years... It feels like I’m in some big Western European, rather German, city: 19th century, streets, greenery, tidy, clean, well-groomed... Compared to Moscow!

Let's talk about Russian rudeness instead of Ukrainians. Shchodennik has dozens of lexemes in kshtalt: “continued to demand in Khokhlatsky”, “cunning little crest”, “this impudent little crest”, “gave this little Ukrainian-Midovite”, “and the little crest [Kravchuk - S. ] his”, “the Ukrainian interviewer [Gorbachov – S. ] didn't let me insert a word" An intellectual, a nobleman by birth, a friend of Moscow philosophers, writers, directors and artists - and at the same time, there is a certain purr when it comes to Ukrainians, and not so? I am at peace with the rudeness of the fool: “I learned with some surprise that Tikhonov [confessed by the 1980 head of the USSR Cabinet of Ministers, an ethnic Russian] is a crest!

Ukraine is simply rolling a steamroller towards Russia"

And Chernyaev’s followers will testify that Gorbachov still doesn’t believe that Ukrainians will vote for independence, and after the referendum, the created SND strongly urged the leaders not to recognize Ukraine.. And some of these leaders praised “friend Michael” for their success in the “arduous process of reunification of the Union”.

This morning, in 2014, the Chernyaev family sued Gorbachov for supporting Putin, who squandered Crimea and “acquired” him from Russia. Such is the irony of history....