It is the Labunsky 02. 10. 2017 g. considered the petition of the lawyer of the Cooper on the withdrawal of the military prosecutor Versiciaga from participating in the case of the second suspect. Judge Labunsky did not grant the solicitor's request, believing that the defense had not provided any evidence of his inability to participate in the process.

Recall a week ago, the lawyer said that this case will very soon turn into the case of the military prosecutor Versiciaga and his accomplices.

On his Facebook page Ilya Bondar writes that "... in the court session on the challenge, Versimage explained to Labunsky that in fact no one 80,000 dollars was taken from anyone that the subject of the" illegal remuneration "transfer was precisely the" doll "and He did not carry 80 thousand US dollars in court and Judge Kushnirenko did not show. About why it was necessary to seize money, which, it turns out, were not material evidence, t. falsify evidence, and why he persuaded Judge Kushnirenko to do this, and to make a deliberately unjustified definition, Vercimage said nothing, as if suggesting that Labunsky himself could guess everything himself. And to every lawyer, even if he is a judge, Labunsky - it is known that the definition of a court that has entered into legal force is the law in this case. Judge Kushnirenko has seized real American money - that means they were, and Vertziaga lies, t. stole them ".

"But even if we believe Versimage that he did not steal money, he only falsified the evidence and incited Judge Kushnirenko to make a knowingly unjustified determination and commit an official forgery - this is enough to divert him from participation in this matter, because he under all circumstances - not a prosecutor, but a werewolf in uniforms, "continues the lawyer.

Lawyer Bondar was sure that Judge Labunsky had to accept one of two versions - either the Versimage falsifier and the thief, or only the falsifier.

But to the surprise of the lawyer, Judge Labunsky did not write anything on this topic. Instead, he wrote that Bondar did not submit any facts that would indicate the impossibility of the participation of the public prosecutor Versimagi in this case.

Ilya Bondar believes that this is a pure official forgery on the part of Judge Labunsky.

In fact, the lawyer presented him with the definition of Judge Kushnirenko and evidence that Nicholas Court was slipped with a "doll". Moreover, Versimage did not dispute these facts.

Lawyer Ilya Bondar believes that the actions of Judge Labunsky fall within the scope of Article 366. 2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine - the entry by an official of deliberately false information in an official document, as well as. 375 h. 2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine - the issuance by a judge of a knowingly unjustified determination from mercenary motives or other personal interest.

"On the" strange "solution of Labunsky, mentioned above, I already reported to the High Council of Justice. And about his crime to the Attorney General - not yet.

But this is a reparable matter, and very soon a fixable. Because the public danger of the prosecutor, who falsifies the evidence in the criminal case, and even more so - stole money (?!) - is many times higher than the public danger of any corrupt official. And the public danger of a judge covering such a prosecutor is even higher than the public danger of this prosecutor. And in the Versimage we will claim a repeated challenge. For the same reasons, "the lawyer wrote on his Facebook page.