Today is the day of memory of deportation of the Crimean Tatars. In this regard, the number of articles written on duty will be written, the speeches will be spoken and everything will repeat itself as it was in the past and the year before last. And at this time, in Crimea again there is a silent deportation of the same Crimean Tatars. This means that all the speeches were and are - vain and nobody cares about why it happened. Common explanations do not bring clarity to this question, and if it were, then in the same Crimea there would be a completely different picture.
In our opinion, this is because the answer to the root question has not been received, or rather, nobody even asked it. All explanations are built of edged stamps, which in the end will be reduced to what Stalin wanted - Stalin did. In fact, the main argument that is usually cited as the reason for the deportation of the Crimean Tatars is their cooperation with the German occupation forces. The delirium of this argument is broken instantly. In the occupied territory, the people most cooperative with the invader were the Russians. Only officially served in the armed forces, security detachments, police and other military and paramilitary bodies, about a million Russians. As many divisions as the Russians have given, no one has ever given. Moreover, even more people worked in non-military organizations and enterprises. If we take as a basis for deportation cooperation with the invaders, then in this case the Russians should not simply be deported, but settled at the bottom of the Kara Sea. But that did not happen.
This means that the purpose of deportation was not the punishment of the Crimean Tatars or the night, but something else. If so, then we should ask the main question, which was not asked in the scoop, for it was dangerous. He sounded like this: "What did Stalin do?". That is, it was necessary literally to understand what Stalin wanted to get in the end. Moreover, even the formula of the "victory of the world proletariat" is not the answer. It is also far from the ultimate goal, like deportation for the sake of punishment.
For the answer it was necessary to imagine what Stalin wanted to create, in case of a final victory. How was that supposed to look? For what were all these things, including wars and massacres, which under Stalin turned into an endless conveyor belt? What in the end should it turn out? After all, do you need to bring tens of millions of your own people to a sacrifice for a very specific purpose? So, what was the ultimate goal? Nobody really put this question, so there is no answer to it either.
Approximately in this perspective, only in a narrower time and geographical gap, such a question was formulated by Viktor Suvorov in his series of books on the period preceding the start of the German-Soviet war. He asked the right question: What did Stalin do? Using open sources, he answered this question and the answer turned out to be logical and destroying all available cliches and stereotypes. From the same sources from which everyone could draw information, including his opponents, he concluded that Stalin was preparing for an aggressive war. He had already prepared the country's economy for this, and the industry was fully operational in the military-industrial complex. Personnel prepared ahead of time and the mobilization reserve grew not only quantitatively, but also its quality was increased many times. Strictly speaking, the country was prepared for a monstrous, in its scale, war and the seizure of territories that could be obtained by land, because the fleet either in Russia or in the scoop never was. These conclusions are so simple, logical and justified that you simply marvel at why for half a century of time since the end of the war no one has been able to build this into a unified theory. But the whole trick is precisely the correctness of posing the question. Any of his opponents, did not even dare to put such a question, and therefore - immediately go to another weight category, small bugs.
By the way, referring to the scoop, many things have to be evaluated not so much in documentary tracks as in the events that undoubtedly took place. In their sequence and scope. This is because key documents that could become objective evidence are hidden in archives with the signature "owls. Secretly ". Moreover, Putin extended this regime until the 1940s of the current century. It is understandable, since access to these archives will finally wash away in the toilet, the wreck of the scoop, the "Russian world" and all the putative combined. The opening of archives is the death sentence not only of ideology, but of Russia itself. Therefore, access to them will not appear before the collapse of Russia.
Editorial site is not responsible for the content of blogs. The editorial opinion may differ from the author's.
Join the group "Browser Blogs" on Facebook, stay tuned!.