Why? And because the fool was given 3.5 probation. Some are appalled. Here is a typical comment: "2017th. The verdict for disbelief in God. Which way did we go in 100 years! "This is stupid, because a fool is condemned for being obscene in public, for which the mind is not necessary.

Several girls desperately tried to become famous in the best of their abilities: right in the store they stuffed (from below) a frozen chicken, collectively mated in the museum, they were all filmed in video, laid out for public viewing. Nothing helped. Finally, they were lucky: they danced to the HHC, got a "dvuhschku", became stars - endless interviews, the attention of the whole planet ... A striking example: the magazine "Charlie" was little known even in France and frankly disrespect for mediocrity and bawdry. But the terrorists attacked the editorial staff, killed the employees and ... True, it's very funny: Gd writes out a power of attorney. Surprised is not the squalor of such jokes, but the fact that they like many.

... And finally - philosophy. Recognizing Sokolovsky as an idiot, the person writes: "No documentary evidence of the presence of God has yet been produced, which can be considered a proof of his absence".

If it's a joke, it's not funnier than the previous one. But if it's serious. In such an ugly logic it's easy to say to this author:

"You can be considered a molester, as there is no documentary evidence that you have not molested any child".

Alexander Minkin. Not that. Golden pen of Russia, however.

The masterpiece was published in the newspaper "MK". Also not x * p in a glass.

Editorial site is not responsible for the content of blogs. The editorial opinion may differ from the author's.

Join the groups "Browser Blogs" on Facebook and VKontakte, stay tuned!.