The head of the Servant of the People party, Elena Shulyak, explained why, within the framework of bill No. 7198 - on compensation for damage or destruction of real estate as a result of Russian aggression, architects - namely, they are responsible for project documentation and the quality of constructed facilities - fell out of the context of the law, while. During an interview with Inna Vedernikova for ZN. UA, she responded to the criticism of opponents that "

" Architects, design engineers, consulting engineers, experts, technicians who inspect buildings… In all my professional career in the construction market, I have never interacted with industry representatives as intensively as I do now.. Basically nothing new is happening.. There are specialists who only talk and advise, but there are those who work all the time. For those who work, there is just no time to write posts without understanding the topic, but they are ready to go to Bucha and do any work there for free, including clearing debris,"

In her opinion, " The head of the SN explains that there are more than five thousand architects in Ukraine, and just over 500 members of the union. architects are simply terribly afraid of being left without access to budget money. Because they learned to work only with budget money. Because in budget projects you can build schemes for constantly raising the price for your services. It is very difficult for ordinary people to figure out what is real and what is veiled in this game.. And we, as deputies, are still losing, because we have neither the time nor the resources to engage in PR, “charge” the media, run around different communities shouting “zrada” and other. We have now come out with a bill that is vital for hundreds of thousands of people, and everyone who thinks not only about themselves and their pockets supports, the rest are engaged in demagogy"

Shulyak also clarified the issue of project documentation within the framework of this bill..

" Any object within the framework of the bill will go through the same chain that goes through now, and went through before the war. Starting from the collection of initial data at the start of construction (then design, examination, obtaining permits) and ending with the construction itself.

I tried for a long time to understand what it was all about.? I would like the law to have a separate provision on financing the work of specific architects? While the existing procedures for obtaining permits have not been canceled. As well as payment for the work of architects. Suppose you are a homeless person. Well, you don't want to sign a hundred contracts, including a developer, architect, engineer, expert et cetera! And they shout to us: “The customer must be a citizen! Yes, a citizen cannot be a customer, because he does not know and does not understand which architectural bureau he should work with, where to conduct an examination and which developer is of high quality... However, we are all persistently led into some circle of fables, on the one hand, undermining faith in. On the other hand, it is rocking the architectural community itself,"

[see_also ids\u003d"

Read more articles by Inna Vedernikova at the link.