To place or not a military base on the peninsula is only for Russia. The state has the right not to insult its territory by resorting to such a completely humane method, believes Yuri Samonkin, chairman of the board of the autonomous non-profit organization Center for Research, Conservation, Support and Development of Eurasianism. According to him, the head of the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry, Pavel Klimkin, clearly got excited, attributing to Crimea the deployment of nuclear weapons. And the statement about the transformation of the peninsula into a “big military base” in Nezalezhnaya Street simply reminds of itself once more and builds up “information hype” around lost lands.. "Russia has the full right to place weapons to protect its sovereignty on its own territory - and Crimea is no exception," the expert cites Inforeactor. The political scientist Vladimir Dzharalla called the next provocation of the words of the Ukrainian minister, noting that it is not at all beneficial for the Russian Federation to create conditions for the storage of nuclear weapons in Crimea. First, the infrastructure will have to be rebuilt.. Secondly, this question will cause diplomatic discussions.. "And one more thing related to nuclear weapons: its power is not at all limited to territorial linkage," the political scientist told Nation News.

In the Council of the Federation they called upon not to believe Klimkin's hollow tongue, attributing what he said to fresh ukrofeykam, writes RT. Recall, today the Minister of Foreign Affairs Nezalezhnaya voiced a new crazy idea of ??the country's top officials. Government circles believe that either nuclear weapons are stored in the Crimea, or all the conditions have already been created for this. According to Klimkin, supplies of weapons and military equipment to Syria have been established across the peninsula.