The United States, France and the United Kingdom dealt a blow to Syria, not to destroy the regime of the republic's president Bashar Assad. In fact, the purpose of this campaign was to destroy the production of chemical weapons. This was stated by British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson. In his opinion, the decision to strike "absolutely true" was a "proportional" response to the alleged Syrian city Duma. "It is very important to note that this is not an attempt to shift the balance in the war in Syria or to achieve a regime change or get rid of Bashar Assad. I'm afraid that the war in Syria will continue anyway, and it's terrible, "Johnson said on the eve of the EU summit in Luxembourg, RIA FAN. It is noteworthy that British Prime Minister Teresa May advocates the destruction of the authority of Bashar Assad.

Although Mae did not mention the direct text about this, however, in her opinion, it is on Assad's regime that the responsibility for the hematoka. As the "Free Press" writes, the blow to Syria cost three countries $ 153 million. Strangely enough, the British have spent the least amount of money. The four fighters sent by them fired just eight missiles, which in total cost 11.2 million dollars. The largest contribution was made by the United States (130.3 million). The French also showed reasonable economy - less than $ 22 million.