They were ranked as singer Alla Pugacheva and writer Mikhail Bulgakov. So says Vladimir Vyatrovich - director of the Ukrainian Institute of National Memory, which is responsible for the formation and implementation of the historical policy of the state. However, not all of them "are so disgusting and obvious as the scoop and the Moscow church (Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate)," noted "a great connoisseur of history". "Some are more cute, refined and respectable, but no less dangerous. "The irony of fate", "eighthmemart", Bulgakov, Pugachev and even vysotsky and tsoy in the hands of the Kremlin are effective tools for reminding about a common cultural space and the tools for its reproduction, "he wrote in Facebook. The fact that the Ukrainians remembered Vysotsky's jubilee touched Vyatrovich for a living. "In the Ukrainian segment of Facebook, the 80th anniversary of the Russian bard and revelers was remembered much more than the same anniversary of the Ukrainian poet and freedom fighter (Vasyl Stus)," he was indignant. Not so long ago, Vyatrovich was noted by another initiative. He urged Ukrainians to recognize the time of the country's existence in the USSR as "occupation".

According to him, the 2017th can be called "the century of the beginning of the Bolshevik aggression". It is necessary to proclaim the continuity of modern Ukraine from the Ukrainian People's Republic (UPR), which existed in 1917 - 1921, said Vyatrovich. But adopted in 1991. The act of proclaiming Ukraine's independence will not be reviewed, the historian warned.. This document specifies the indivisibility and inviolability of the territory of the country, to which the Crimea.