The new US security strategy is an open threat to the world. This was stated by the head of the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the Federation Council of Russia Konstantin Kosachev. Having studied the document presented on the eve of the White House, the senator warns: Americans are preparing the world for a coup, as a result of which they want to become the head of all. According to Kosachev, the US authorities can not accept the fact that America is no longer prayed that more and more countries allow themselves to have their own views that do not coincide or even contradict the position of the United States. The very "tonality of the document" shows that "the United States does not accept changes in the world in recent years, and they intend to wrap them around, returning the recent version of Pax Americana as an allegedly just world order," Kosachev said.. They do it simply: by force of arms and economic sanctions. The decision to strengthen the "eastern flank of NATO," groundless accusations against Russia in alleged violation of the treaty on medium-range and short-range missiles (INF) - all this is necessary for Washington "to untie ourselves". "The US is clearly betting on power in all areas, from the economy to the defense, and America first will mean" America is the strongest - it means it's right, "Kosachev wrote in his Facebook, noting that the opening picture is very disturbing. Indeed, the head of the Pentagon, James Mattis, commenting on the new Strategy, has already promised that the military department will help politicians implement the chosen course. "As the most powerful military in the world, the US military provides our diplomats with the opportunity to always speak from a position of strength. With the support of our allies and partners, we will continue to defend our common security interests, protecting America from those who seek to threaten the freedom that we have, "Matthews quotes RIA Novosti as saying. And who is threatening America? Everything is traditional. Of course, this is the DPRK and Iran, which Washington calls rogue states. Of course, these are terrorists from the Middle East. But, in addition, the United States sees a clear danger to itself in Russia's nuclear weapons. Russia considers Russia's investment in "new military capabilities" a direct threat. In this regard, the head of the White House, Donald Trump, has already promised to exert all efforts to ensure that in the next draft of the state budget, US military spending is provided for more money. I must say, this shocked even the director of the American Council of National Interests, former CIA officer Philip Giraldi. "To give more money to the military, when there are already too many of them, is stupidity. In particular, because it will create such a tool that any president will want to use to solve problems abroad, "Giraldi said in a conversation with RIA Novosti,. However, it's not just about weapons. Russia and China are troubling the United States in all areas: they invest where the Americans create regional economic unions, which the US does not invite. Thus, "China and Russia are challenging the US power, influence and interests of the United States, trying to undermine the security and prosperity of the United States," is explicitly spelled out in the new Strategy. The US authorities do not hide that they are going to throw all the forces and opportunities to resist this ubiquitous "competition". Yes, unlike the Obama administration, the Trump administration more often uses the term not "enemy", but "competitor".

But the essence of this does not change, says the leading expert of the Center for Contemporary Politics, political analyst-American Viktor Olevich.

"The goals of the American foreign policy establishment have remained the same. This is primarily the maintenance of an American-centric unipolar world order. And within the framework of this strategy, any power that conducts an independent foreign policy and refuses to go in the wake of Washington's course is automatically regarded as a geopolitical competitor, and therefore as an adversary, "the expert said in a commentary by RT.