Now I will describe scheme number 2, how the directors and middle management of Ukroboronprom earn money, using the example of my enterprise.

The following is the text in the original language. It’s no secret that at the enterprises of Ukroboronprom it is important to have “red directors” who have long been in the minds of some of the changes in power in the UOP administration.. For example, my director is 74 years old and has already been 15 years since the creation of Ukroboronprom - the permanent manager.

Do you think he’s even more talented Of course not. Having been in the Ukroboronprom for 15 years, only two of them have resulted in the production of defense products, not under contracts with the Ministry of Defense, but through subcontracting for private contractors, some of which are heavily influenced by the uniqueness of the powers.

Why, you ask, this is the defense industry? The fact that he was completely controlled by the model, if there is no state control, and therefore no state control, is also important, and it is important to pay for the market in the amount of 100 to 150 million UAH.. In this case, it is clear that there was an imitation of defense activity, which was at the expense of the enterprise, the remainder of the profits, withdrawals from rent, and expenses were written off there.

The schemes are actually more primitive, but they work effectively, and the middle management of Ukroboronprom is in charge of ensuring the stability of the director’s position, and he is likely to pay for his services. At our enterprise there is a connection between the director and the head of the visual field, which represents Ukroboronprom. Apparently, this representative and forms the daily procedure for his staff and is placed both before the director and before the third-party shareholder, so that before.

This representative has been testifying for our business for 15 years. During this hour, the kerivnitsa UOP had 15 kerivniki, and our curator is unchanged. The reason is simple: all UOP officials are, on the one hand, incompetent in the areas of corporate governance, and on the other hand, they have more “profitable” other issues, which they give all their respect to..

If you think that everything is so primitive and the food is deprived of the director’s forehead, then you will have mercy. Ukroboronprom has created a whole system for assessing the activity of enterprises, a kind of rules of the game and a red line for directors who want to govern further.

For example, business is not to blame for being overpriced. And we’ve never had anything like this before. After all, it was always a profit, but the profit was always going to break. For example, a business earns 100, 200 or 300 million in income from cash bags forever, but in the end, it loses between 10 and 12 million UAH. Everything else goes to fictitious expenses. Formally, the enterprise has always been pributkova. Alternatively, shareholders, instead of collecting a dividend of UAH 100 million, will take away an additional UAH 3–5 million, leaving them to pay for the UOP method 30–50% and 10–12 million for the roku bonuses. I control everything. If there is more profit, it means more payments, rather than a dividend to shareholders.

Below is a methodology for assessing the activity of insurance companies, including debt to wages, debt to the budget, loans, conflicts in enterprises, and it is clear that everything will be fine with us in the future.!

I any complaints to the director? Virology plans are no longer in terms of released products, but in growth figures. For example, 200 thousand. UAH, this is the order of numbers. And honestly, the products of the Ukroboronprom enterprise are not to be compromised (the agreement between startups is not an issue, but it is a result of tight control), it is reasonable that there is no need to talk about the development strategy. The director has one job - to rent out the premises. For example, the planned return on assets is 0.005%. And this is the whole essence of government. Who is our business focused on On one side to startups close to the President, on the other side to the management of Ukroboronprom and the management of the enterprise. Unfortunately, this financial scheme of shareholders simply does not have. And I’ve put the numbers only on the order, and on the production they are earning even more, so it’s important to get this information - the holder!

For example, in the 3rd quarter of 2025, the company had revenues of approximately UAH 200 million for financial purposes, as the difference between sales and cooperation. I needed to immediately grab the profit figure. They came up with a brilliant idea, it seemed like we had a lot of money, which means extra money, they deprived him of 2 million, but everyone else showed that it was extra money, but the extra money was for the sake of basic benefits, and not pennies for spending money.

I put nutrition not less on the visual side, but also on sour cream, which means that the financial result from operating activities changes to the additions of inflows (the main features), since they have not yet been removed and. Say: You don’t understand these international standards! Financial assets were mixed behind the backdrop of government activity and the production of cash flows and disputes, which have not yet been assessed, but the trend is reasonable. Write off pennies for repairs. With whom no one has a cost and does not give an assessment. We keep everything in storage!

Or, for example, there was a situation when the members of the board wrote a statement to NABU that the enterprise was stealing close to 100 million UAH.. I Do you think this is the reaction My initiative was subject to a state audit, and I wanted to undergo an anti-corruption audit. Ale navіt, having revealed the destruction of 150 million UAH, there is no reaction. Moreover, representatives of Ukroboronprom were willing to officially withdraw audit materials. It's so possible? It appears that in our country it is possible. No audit, no problems! I was also encouraged to work at the enterprise under the auditor’s authority (and I am a shareholder with 40% of the shares) and even after the NABU gave the command to see the materials to us.

But I know, I’m already enlarged, since those that are visible to the eye, we can write books about those that cannot manage the state’s mine.

I will add as a butt one of the remaining sheets on Smetanin, so that you understand that this is not bad for the imagination of the shareholder, who wants some kind of special priority for himself.

The total incompetence of people who represent management leads to the fact that shareholders are spending their money and assets over time, and I’m not talking about the business opportunities that have emerged from the association..

I will place 2 sheets in the addendum. One message to Smetanina about current problems and the testimony of a specialized advocate. I think there’s nothing to comment here.

In my next post, I will increase the emphasis on corporate governance.