Bailiffs have begun selling their own first deputy chairman of the National Bank, Ekaterina Rozhkova, for debts to the Deposit Guarantee Fund. So, December 30, 2024 for 502.3 thousand. UAH went under the hammer for her parking space in Kyiv at the address:. Volynskaya 10.

Mrs. Rozhkova herself reported this on January 6, 2025 in the report of NAPC (National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption). The information indicates that the sale took place as part of enforcement proceedings 72392283. In total, Ekaterina Rozhkova has 16 court cases and 5 enforcement proceedings listed in the state registers, and number 72392283 is assigned to the proceedings in the high-profile case of the Deposit Guarantee Fund against Platinum Bank, which is still in the process of liquidation. That is, FGVFL specialists are still selling off the property of this financial institution and carrying out various collections in favor of the affected depositors with deposits of more than 200 thousand. UAH (which have already been compensated to the victims) and other creditors.

The National Bank decided to revoke the license of Platinum Bank in February 2017, and the Federal Guarantee Fund almost immediately put it on liquidation. The Guarantee Fund filed a lawsuit against the former management of Platinum only in June 2020; among the defendants were top managers: former members of the bank’s supervisory board, including Grigory Gurtovoy, as well as chairman of the board Konstantin Smolsky and. Head of the Board Ekaterina Rozhkova, who at that time already worked at the National Bank. In total, officials sued 11 persons associated with the bank for a total of UAH 1.48 billion.

The legal confrontation lasted almost four years - until March 2024, when, as OBOZ wrote, Rozhkova, along with 10 former colleagues, lost the case. The Cassation Economic Court as part of the Supreme Court recognized the requirements of the Guarantee Fund as legal.

However, Ekaterina Viktorovna also continued to resist after that and tried to appeal in court the actions of the State Executive Service (Department of Civil Service of the Ministry of Justice) to recover her property through procedural issues. And on November 21, 2024 in the Solomensky District Court. Kyiv still lost the case for the production of 2-a/760/1150/24.

And now it has become known that within a month the sale of the first property of Ekaterina Rozhkova took place as part of the relevant proceedings. She did not officially declare any other sales reports.

For the entire year 2024, Ms. Rozhkova made only one “Notification about significant changes in property status”. This happened on July 10 and it was about paying for education in Ukraine for 348 thousand. UAH and also corrected my declaration for 2023.

And even after the adjustments, this 2023 declaration did not contain data on what was now sold for 502.3 thousand. UAH real estate, that is, the above-mentioned parking space on the street. Volynskaya 10. Although the state register contains information that Mrs. Ekaterina owns a parking space and an apartment at this address.

The amended version of the declaration for 2023, owned by Ekaterina Rozhkova, lists the following real estate assets:.

The banker also reported one unfinished house in the village.. Markhalovka (Kyiv region) with a total area of \u200b\u200b299.1 sq.. She also listed numerous jewelry (watches) and the use of a 2008 Honda CR-V foreign car.

The lawyers explained that the executors will try to sell all the property of Ms. Rozhkova and other defendants, according to the debt of each. Although it is not yet known for certain how exactly the payment of UAH 1.48 billion is distributed to the 11 people who lost the Guarantee Fund trial.

And he clarified that the executive service also has the right to contact the employer - in this case the National Bank - with a requirement to regularly (monthly) collect 20% of the debtor’s current salary/remuneration.

“It doesn’t matter how exactly a person receives his salary - on a bank card or in cash. The employer (NBU), after the bailiff’s appeal, must withhold 20% of the amount and transfer it to pay off the debt. The same procedure as for the maintenance of alimony,” added Kravets.