The court seized 80 real estate objects in different regions of Ukraine, owned by trade union organizations and illegally sold to private owners. This was reported by the press service of the DBR.

The investigation claims that from 1992 to the present, officials of the Federation of Trade Unions and private joint-stock companies controlled by the Federation, by prior agreement by a group of persons, formalized the alienation of health resorts, sports and other state complexes.

[see_also ids\u003d"

Among the objects:.

hotels \;

sanatorium \;

\;

\;

Polyana in Transcarpathia;

sports complexes, including the building in which the Kyiv Sport Club is located.

As part of a joint investigation with the SBU, it was found that since 1992, employees of the Federation of Trade Unions of Ukraine and joint-stock companies controlled by it formalized the alienation of health resorts, sports and other state complexes.

The property was transferred to the National Agency for the Detection, Search and Management of Assets Obtained from Corruption and Other Crimes (ARMA).

[see_also ids\u003d"

Recall that the idea to deal with May of trade unions is not new. In 2012, the Ministry of Economic Development came up with a proposal to recognize as state property all the property that was held by public associations (organizations) as of August 24, 1991.

This was preceded by 35 criminal cases and 147 lawsuits for the return of 45 objects and land plots with an area of \u200b\u200bmore than 34 hectares, illegally withdrawn from state property by trade unions.

In 1994, the late ex-head of the State Property Fund Valentina Semenyuk said from the rostrum of the Verkhovna Rada that privatization in Ukraine is taking place without the creation of a legislative field and rules of the game.

In 2004 she wrote an article for ZN. UA, in which it argued that "

To date, the most famous examples of reprivatization in Ukraine have been the return to state ownership of Kryvorizhstal OJSC, Nikopol Ferroalloy Plant OJSC (NFP), Nikopol South Pipe Plant OJSC.

And although we are talking about the return to the state in the management of these objects, however, the concept of "

Thus, the results of privatization can be reviewed in accordance with the current legislation of Ukraine. The Law "

According to part 5 of article 27 of the Law, at the request of one of the parties, the sale and purchase agreement may be terminated or invalidated by a court decision if the other party fails to fulfill the obligations stipulated by the sale and purchase agreement within the prescribed time limits.

Part 6 of Article 29 of the Law provides that violation of the privatization procedure established by law or the rights of buyers is the basis for invalidating the contract for the sale of the privatization object.

Privatized property can be returned to the state forcibly only in a judicial proceeding..