The complaint of the Siemens Gas Turbine Technology Company, Siemens subsidiary, on the refusal of the court to arrest the gas turbines in the Crimea was not satisfied. The Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeals found the decision of the Moscow Arbitration Court fair. "Leave the ruling of the court unchanged, the complaint without satisfaction," - RIA Novosti quoted the judge's words. In their lawsuit, Siemens structures were required to seize the turbines supplied for the power plants being built in Crimea, to prohibit their transportation, installation, operation, modification and in general any use, including sale. In November 2017 g. the court rejected these claims. Now the highest authority has recognized that the verdict is legal. Let us recall that in January 2018. Moscow Arbitration rejected the claim of the daughter of Siemens, who tried to declare her contract null and void March 10, 2015. to supply turbines to Technopromexport and return the equipment to its possession. On this refusal the plaintiff also filed an appeal, which should be considered on April 9.

The company Siemens Gas Turbine Technology, 65% owned by the German concern Siemens and 35% by the Russian "Power Machines", insists that the four controversial turbines of its production were in the Crimea without her knowledge. Meanwhile Rostekh, whose structures are OJSC and Tekhnopromexport LLC, indicates that the equipment was purchased on the secondary market, modified to the required standards by Russian specialists and therefore can not be considered the property of Siemens.