At the beginning of the hot summer transfer window, FIFA praised Circular No. 1970, which dealt with the reform of Article 17 of the Regulation on the status and transfer of citizens.

The basis for the change was the decision of the EU Court of Justice against Lassane Diarre against the Moscow locomotive (Case C-650/22), which recorded the advance - the rules of FIFA at that time should violate the law for transfers of drivers. Rozglyad spravi trivav z 2014 rock to chervenya 2026 rock.

FIFA issues Article 17 to its new decisions. 1, in any case, the pre-line clauses of the contract are subject to the control of proportionality: the compensation will be negotiated, so as not to appear clearly excessive and unfair from the situation in the real situation.

Subject to the prescribed clause, compensation will be provided according to objective and fixed criteria: excess liability, unpaid wine to the city, replacement liability and excess payment.

In the opinion of the authors of the reform, it is not possible to put an end to the protection of astronomical sums, the only method of which is not compensation, but an actual blockade of the transfer of the gravel to other clubs.

For example, Julian Alvarez’s contract with Atletico Madrid was subject to a clause of 500 million euros, which is 40 times greater than the official’s gross income, so the new rules are not covered.

However, according to statistics 17. 1 fall inclusive of lands that were registered after 1st September 2027.

However, the Argentinean is still deprived of the open “way of Diarra”: the absolute brutality to the primary labor jurisdiction, relying on the statute 45 and 101 DFES, the primary right of the Union of direct action, which is paramount.

What does article 16 reach?. 1 of the Spanish Royal Decree 1006/1985: compensation for unilateral severance is fixed by the judge, and Spanish social jurisprudence has previously mitigated the clearly disproportionate clauses of severance through.