About escalation in Russian skies and Putin’s order to destroy Ukrainian energy

Yesterday, 22:43 | The Company 
фото с Обозреватель

Putin's statement that he ordered strikes on the Ukrainian energy system is certainly not a response to Zelensky's ultimatum to close Russian skies. Russia has and will continue to attack our energy system.

The following is the text in the original language. There is no direct causal link here? language. I will look even more respectfully at those that are the subject of both? will clearly be promoted by various information channels and become part of the information war of the Russian Federation. With this, we can also understand: 2026 rivers, having further expanded the red lines, which were not taboos in the literal meaning of the word. The reason for the importance of these very mental red lines lies not in moral principles, but in the increased emphasis on the capabilities of individuals.. Scaling, first for all unmanned systems, is changing and will change during the course of this war, not only at the front, but also in the back.

Should you be paralyzed in an air accident in the Russian Federation At a minimum, it is possible to frequently close the main airports of Russia and thus bring war to Moscow and St. Petersburg, first of all. One more aspect: air delivery is one of the main logistics functions for Russia. The closure of airports, in particular, will be a huge blow to the economic, moral and psychological state in the Russian Federation. I repeat once again: the discussion about the fact that it is impossible to correct the closed sky and 10 years without light is incorrect. Russia planned to attack our energy this way. Unknown until our attacks on airports.

It is very important that Putin specifically stated that there will be no mobilization. Dosi vin utrivavshis these statements. It looks like the situation with our information campaign “anti-mobilization” is starting to bear fruit. The mood of the Russian marriage seems to be such that Putin is especially likely to say that he is ready to take a step back. You can no longer access mobile services or go off the Internet. Ale poki vin zmusheny vyznati chastkova sub? The activity of its population and will come soon. Statements about those that there will be no mobilization (literally “bullshit” – this is precisely the definition of mobilization. This also led to an increase in repression. Putin cannot expose such weakness to himself. Ale we can’t blame ourselves in the future (transferred) of such plans. Therefore, we are on the lookout for new repressive ideas.

Unfortunately, there are currently no urgent changes of mind for negotiations. In this regard, we see two trends:.

– Trump is trying to play a goddamn peace deal with Putin. This game comes down to two aspects: first of all, try to get in for everyone’s sake (Redcliffe’s visit and the possible future of the FBI security officer with the FSB security officers - this is often, about this. Or, in other words, if you don’t give in, then a disgusting policeman gets involved. This line was most clearly demonstrated by the Minister of Finance Besent, who, at the summit of the twenty, declared to his counterpart Siluanov that there would be no homeownership as long as the war continued. However, in general, the Ukrainian war is not viewed by the United States as a single case. As long as the election is over, the logic is on: to give in to please - let’s say to the voters. Don’t give in, let’s say, as Trump tried.

– Another trend – the PRC watches for the failure of American initiatives and requests for dialogue.

– Okremo varto gain respect for Modi’s peaceful statement. India will still stand to the side, but in the future, both? linguistically join the Qiu group.

As we talk about the time lags of theoretically possible negotiations, then in an ideal scenario, China is requested to negotiate? appear at the Trump-Si meeting. In a faded scenario, such a request could be? arrive before the end of spring 2027. In a negative scenario - no earlier than across the river.

Источник: Обозреватель