After loud statements about possible copyright infringement by Tony Matvienko, the situation seems to have reached its logical conclusion. Evgeny Rybchinsky said that after the public conflict, the singer called him personally to find out all the details and resolve the misunderstanding.

As the composer said in “Snidanku z 1+1”, the claims did not concern him personally, but belonged to Svetlana Poklad, the widow and heiress of the creative legacy of the late composer Igor Poklad, who created this song (the lyrics were written by Yuri Rybchinsky). It was she who expressed dissatisfaction with the fact that Matvienko performed her husband’s compositions without official permission.

“To be honest, I had no complaints about Tonya. The claims were made by Svetlana Poklad, who is the heir to all the work of her husband, the late Igor Poklad. And in the program that was being recorded, I warned Tonya that danger awaited her,” explained Evgeniy Rybchinsky.

According to him, after that he and Tonya Matvienko got on the phone and were able to calmly discuss the situation. " I explained that this is not entirely true. If I allow you something, this does not mean that you can allow it to your children and grandchildren,” the composer noted.

They were talking, in particular, about the famous composition “Charming Violin”, created in 1971 by Igor Poklad to the words of Yuri Rybchinsky. The song was first performed by the group " Now, according to Evgeny Rybchinsky, all disputes have been settled, and there are no more claims against Nina Matvienko’s daughter. Previously, the singer’s husband, Arsen Mirzoyan, had already responded to this situation.. In an interview with Alexei Sukhanov, he called the scandal a “painful blow” for his wife and advised her not to react to such “reproaches”. " To respond to such reproaches, a person must be on the same level or higher with you. If this person is lower, you have no right to react to him. It’s like disrespect for yourself,” the performer said.

Mirzoyan also added that he does not plan to make loud statements, because, according to him, the situation is in “suspense” and does not have specific legal actions.

" This is just some kind of freak situation and rubbish that has entered the public sphere. This is not how issues are resolved. Something happened without specifics. If this were a lawsuit, this would be specifics. Then you need to find tools and defend yourself. Otherwise, these are just conversations on social networks,” Mirzoyan noted..