The Verkhovna Rada may soon adopt a law on certain features of the organization of the enforcement of court decisions and decisions of other bodies during martial law. On March 13, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that the Parliament adopt the corresponding bill 8064 in the second reading and as a whole, writes Judicial-Yuristicheskaya Gazeta..

So far, there is no comparative table for the second reading, however, as Committee member Igor Fris said, the main key provisions in the bill are as follows:.

natural persons - debtors whose funds are seized by the state executive service, private executors can carry out debit transactions from a current account in an amount that, within one calendar month, does not exceed two minimum wages established by the Law of Ukraine on the State Budget for. Foreclosure within the specified amount on such an account is not carried out.

before the entry into force of the law on the settlement of relations with the participation of persons associated with the aggressor state, enforcement actions are stopped, it is prohibited to replace exactors in enforcement proceedings, the exactors of which are the Russian Federation or persons associated with it.

legal entities - debtors, self-employed persons (using the hired labor of individuals), whose funds are seized by the state executive service, private executors can carry out debit transactions from current accounts solely for the payment of wages in the amount of not more than five minimum wages per month.

it is forbidden to open enforcement proceedings on the basis of executive inscriptions of notaries made on loan agreements that are not notarized.

[see_also ids\u003d"

The head of the Association of Private Performers, Vitaly Chepurny, highlighted the following changes:.

The minimum amount protected from arrest was established in the amount of 2 minimum wages (the bill originally provided for 3).

Recovery from wages of debtors is allowed. With the introduction of the minimum amount protected from seizure, this step is quite necessary in the interests of creditors.

It is allowed to execute all executive inscriptions: mortgage, pledge, leasing and others, except for those made under contracts in simple written form.

Plus a bonus - it will be possible to carry out old productions according to such executive inscriptions, opened before the introduction of martial law.

Substitution norm approved. Performers from occupied territories and territories with active hostilities are given the opportunity to change the district, continue to do old things and take on new ones..

The Ministry of Justice will also receive the authority to check private executors, whether they carry out activities. Based on the result, an audit report will be drawn up..

How the judicial system was reformatted during the war? What are the mechanisms for identifying collaborating judges and what is done with them next? Why is the OASK still working, where Yanukovych's lawsuit lies, and how it is fraught with our statehood? Why e-court is needed right now and who its implementation depends on? What can the critical underfunding of the Cabinet of Ministers mean for the judiciary? Read about this and much more in the interview of Inna Vedernikova with the head of the Supreme Court Vsevolod Knyazev: “I am ashamed of the decision of the members of the Supreme Court of Justice who resigned two days before the start of the war”.