The latest London attack, already described by experts as an act of revenge for the orthodox, can open a new chapter in the history of modern radicalism. This time a terrorist from non-Islamic circles struck a blow at the innocent parishioners of the mosque, using the methods of his "colleagues" Islamic radicals, against whom, as can be assumed, the action was directed. The latter, in turn, call for revenge - the circle is closed.

As reported, 47-year-old native of Weston-Super-Mayor Darren Osborn, father of four children, recently living in Cardiff, rammed a group of believers in his van, there are dead and wounded. The Muslim Council of Great Britain has already stated that the parishioners have been victims of Islamophobia, which they have experienced in their entirety over the past weeks. The driver reproduced the scenario of the terrorist attack carried out recently by three Islamic radicals on the London Bridge. That is, the offender, in all likelihood, was aiming at a "world evil" in the form of an "Islamic state" (to which, from his point of view, all the followers of Islam are involved in one way or another), but not far from the phenomenon he condemned as in the choice Tools, and in the choice of casual innocent victims.

It is clear that revenge on the believers for IGIL is nonsense. Islamic authorities and ordinary Muslims have been condemning the builders of the "caliphate" for years to cover their unseemly acts with religious banners. "God-fearing is afraid to commit a misdemeanor, so as not to anger the Almighty. God-fearlessness excludes terrorism, "says the political scientist, Orientalist, head of the Association of Public Associations" Assembly "Muhamed Salyakhetdinov. Consequently, acts of terrorism on behalf of Islam have political roots, far from real religiosity, by default implying God-fearing.

However, in these nuances the freshly-baked terrorist was too lazy to understand. Moreover, according to experts, it is possible that such actions of revenge on the part of Europeans, tired of migrants and inaction of the authorities, will continue. At least, although Security Minister Ben Wallace said that the perpetrator acted alone and had not previously been seen by the police, according to media reports, the current terrorist might have had accomplices, and this already makes the version of the crime in a state of affect unreliable.

Photo: twitter @News_Executive In the opinion of the head of the Center for the Analysis of Terrorist Threats Ramil Latypov, the patience of Europeans is crowded: "the tolerance and tolerance of the authorities and the population begins to diverge on different shores". "If the authorities of European countries do not take harsh measures against migrants, such" public courts ". They can be called terrorist attacks, but in fact it's revenge, "he said..

Meanwhile, observers note one more circumstance. The previous terrorist attacks by Islamic radicals look strange both from the point of view of motivation and from the point of view of execution. To press and kill everyone in a row is illogical: after all, among the dead there may be supporters of the IG itself (and to kill like-minded people is a sin even for a fanatic). These acts of terrorism must not be perceived in the context of religious confrontation, but as political actions that solve certain tasks, experts believe, and it is necessary to look to whom it is profitable.

Even in recent terrorist acts - if we ignore the last case - there is one common pattern: before becoming terrorists, their perpetrators went through the crucible of law enforcement agencies, for example, those who made a run on the London Bridge, according to the Air Force, were already under Sight of the police and even, as the Daily Mail wrote, were the heroes of the film about jihadists.

Nevertheless, experts from Islamic circles come to the conclusion that it is senseless to seek religious motivation in these cases - the religious motive is not even attracted to "ears", but political motives, if desired, are easy to find. For example, sometimes very "timely" terrorist attacks raise the ratings of some politicians and omit others, working to general destabilization of the situation in the country. Perhaps now it is profitable for someone to sow chaos and religious strife in the UK, toughening Muslims, defaming social groups and inflaming the already difficult situation.