One of the symptoms of the traditional autumn aggravation of political (and not only political) illnesses was the explication (it is worth using this scientific term) of more or less updated projects for a “good Russia”. That is, one in which everyone will live well and which will be perceived as a worthy and honest partner of Europe, America and Asia with Africa, that is, both the global West and the global South (with all the conventions of these terms, when the West includes Australia, and the South includes communist China).

The following is the text in the original language. The paths of most of the adherents of “good Russia” seem to be quite simple: put the “autocrat Putin” under the leadership of his team, stop his “war of one god” with Ukraine, settle down about.

What is the matter with Ukraine, then it may lead to the spread of rot among the Russian population, and this will give rise to the reasons for Russian aggressive actions against it. From the occupied Ukrainian territories there is a clear message, aka “Crime is not a sandwich”, following Navalny’s famous formula. And Donbas? Well, “Lenin gave Ukraine”... And they burst into tears when they found one contender for the role of a “good Russian”, recognizing Putin as a maniac: “Ukraine and its politicians, in their own way, did not reveal a maniacal obsession with Donbass and Krim? It was impossible for Hiba to divorce them peacefully, as civilized friends are separated after a year? " The speech is clear, and those who are in our hands will vigorously fight against the new Russian Empire and actively contribute to this fight. That language is not about them.

Well, the first breed of “good Russians” is quite a shout-out, well-known among Western Europe and the US public, as it is impossible to radically change Russia through non-violent actions and influx into power. Having said that, such an approach is consistent with the current principles of democracy. So the public plans to take part from. sound. elections to the State Duma of the Russian Federation, scheduled for 18-20 spring. There is talk about the adoption of the method of “reasonable voting”, so that the encouragement is not of “United Russia”, but of other parties, communists and extreme Nazis, evidence of the servants of racism in the decorative parliament (it is not beautiful. Russians are called upon to come to the polling stations, take ballots and show off their “fairy” to Putin. What needs to be noted is that such actions will actually demonstrate something completely different, and the very mythology of such a “people’s rule”, which existed both in the USSR and in the Third Reich? De facto, such a public is the allies of the “collective Putin”, who becomes the majority of the population of Russia.

Another variety of “good Russians” was noted for the Yabluko party, which was trying to take part in the elections, legitimizing the totalitarian mode of the Russian Federation and not demanding its deprivation. About the “Kremlin security officers” there were thoughts that with the participation of “Yabloko” in the elections and the party’s successful passage to the Duma, the rest could be determined by two or three leading spirits, who are not unimportant. And if anyone from this party will try to break through the Duma through the majority districts, no one will have a chance due to the mood of the population (across the Russian Federation, it is theoretically possible to get 10-12% of the votes, and in the surrounding district; At the very least, it is difficult to name the “correct” data in the majority district, having already seen the district Communist Party’s performance in the by-elections in 1988, and in Kiev! And of course, “Yabluko” de facto also played and plays on Putin’s side.

Not surprisingly, the TV show asked Russians to fully exercise their constitutional right and take part in elections. He said that participation in elections is a huge contribution to the victory of Russia. And for the first category of third-party approaching posters, this clearly looks like evidence of the presence of democracy in the Russian Federation, as a symbol of the legitimacy of Putin, especially Vladimir Vladimirovich. Although, perekonany, dosi її respects the liberals and the enemy of racism. Ale... Axis fragment I appeared on " There was a great burden that we carried on the tractors of Pershaya Svetova and stumbled into a posture. I would be pleased, working in the genre of alternative fiction, to look at the world in which the capital of Russia would be near Constantinople, and the Balkan Slavic lands would often be found at the warehouse of the Austro-Ugric region and would often be found. Gvalt! It was the war for Constantinople itself, and not the capital Bolsheviks, that destroyed the empire! And the republic was voted not by the Bolsheviks at all! Historical knowledge of the " And the look at Ukraine is basically the same: Ukraine is unlikely to lose its “provincial” language and culture, becoming such a “other Russia”, and only then gain independence (from Russian hands,. That’s why all of Latin’s invective towards Ukraine is so sensible – calling it “another Hamas”. And so it would be better to live in “Russian Ukraine” without Ukrainians and Putin... In this case, without Latina, there are “good Russians” who want to transform Ukraine into “Russia 2”. 0" That's it, that's the topic.

I’ll immediately point out that the American analyst Michael Rubin has proposed to do without “Russia 2”. 0" Michael Rubin appreciates that dividing Russia into 4-5 powers was neither unprecedented nor amazing. The lessons of the 20th and 21st centuries, according to Michael Rubin, show that the world will not survive if Russia loses its unity. The international partnership may dissolve Russia at the expense of the dissolution of the Austro-Ugric Empire. Finland, Poland, Ukraine and Japan could have taken back the territories occupied by Russia this time. As for me, the idea is not so absurd, not just like the madness of the “good Russians”, but not so?