We have been fighting the war for five years, but we still have not agreed on what is considered a victory.. Although it is this discussion that will determine what our country will be like after the war, writes Pavel Kazarin for the publication "

The following is the text in the original language. Our forces were collapsing simultaneously from the front line. In 2022, the Russians were eliminated from the Kiev, Chernigov and Sumy regions, captured the Snake Islands, carried out the Kharkov counter-offensive and, until the end of the fate, captured Kherson. As a result, in 2023, we were convinced that the scenario of our victory was the result of 1991 fate. Everyone is ready to wait for the next day, except for those who, following the scenario, overcame the collapse of the Russian Federation.

That's why we became custodians of the powerful myth about the war. Until recently, the main war on the continent was the Friend of the World - and the scenario and its completion were inadvertently projected to the authorities. Druga Svitova was the butt of what evil can be overcome, occupied and re-invigorated. When evil comes before the court, it pays reparations and reflects its evils. By the middle of the last century, we’ll get to the bottom of how difficult it was to put an old stencil on a new story..

Three years later, the war grounded our settlements.

The war did not spread between our land. Fighting activities switched from war to war. Suddenly, despite everything, we were able to sharpen the Radian tank fist, which was folded for a throw to the English Channel. Transform the Black Sea Fleet into a flotilla. And as more Russians are seen on the battlefield, the Russian power is about to be put on the line.

And if tomorrow we reach the frozen war along the lower line of the front, we can completely write down this scenario in the formula for our victory.

In our war, we were initially given the role of underdog. We were Spartans, not Persians. Finnish lust, not Radian divisions. Our mission from the very beginning was to prevent the enemy from reaching his goals. And since Moscow has insured us to save our state power and sovereignty, then saving this and that in a significant way means helping us in this war.

Obviously, Moscow’s name was not Siversk, not Bakhmut and not Mariupol. These commandments will reach the western cordons of our land - or the transformation of Ukraine into Belarus. And if we manage to preserve independence and sovereignty, this means that the goals of the invasion have failed. Why Moscow burned its military resources and financial reserves. Why did she exchange her influx and place in the international arena to start a war in which she did not achieve her goals?. Because Russia, despite its size, money and resource resources, is breaking up against the Ukrainian defense, we can respect ourselves by overcoming.

Rozmovi about the cordons of 1991 fate would have been pre-river, as if we were a favorite in this war, not an underdog. The one who respects the enemy beyond all criteria can achieve complete and unguarded defeat of the enemy.. We will initially remove such an option - and therefore, in our situation, the expansion of the occupation of territories may be just a bonus to the rider of victory, and not its main replacement. Mathematics is against us: the size of economies and population, the defense budget and military production. In such a situation, any attempt to tie the victory to the cordons of 1991 looks like a significant feat of the Ukrainian army. Abo yak gra na koristi voroga.

Because the discussion about the criteria for victory is not just a theoretical matter, but a completely practical one.

The country that prevailed in the war, and the country that lost, are growing to the point of impossibility. Peremoga is always inclusive. She has a lot of dads, and under her umbrella there is a place for everyone. Those who fought, and those who worked in the defense industry. Those who paid taxes, and those who contributed to higher education. Those who have left, and those who have lost. Victory in the war is transformed into a collective triumph, and the day of victory becomes confirmation of the subjectivity of the nation. We wonder what allows us to say: “we reached” and “we could”.

With amazement, everything is in vain. Vaughn starts the process of national frustration. The country is immersed in the search for wine. They call the military, then - the military, and all at once - those who left the country. Euroskepticism is becoming the mainstay of domestic policy - allies are called to the irrelevance that led to defeat. National identity is weaker because it is associated with program - and regional versions of identity are beginning to replace it. Both sides and sides become the head emotion of the edge.

For these very reasons, since Russia cannot overcome us, it will do everything in order to transfer us from the one who lost us. If she manages to impose her agenda on us, then solidarity and synergy will become the main deficit of wartime Ukraine. We will be the extreme of ressentiment and internal trenches. A perfect target for Russian revenge.

A thought about those who can overcome without the cordons of 1991 rock, who singly surrender to the blues. But for the development of resources, armies and capital, it wouldn’t be enough to be different. We had to fight against the largest country on the planet - which, besides, the function of the tile was provided by another economy to the world. The favorite can allow himself to set maximalist goals - the inaccessibility of any similar features. And the applicant sets those tasks that are within his power - and evaluates the result based on the resources available to him.

The post-war battle for the description of the war's ally Russia may reveal internal Ukrainian political struggle. The victory is significant not only for the position of the nation and the army - but also for the situational strengthening of the government. And here political competitors may no longer be of any use. Some build up old shells. Others - fight for their place in the sun. And this time, the Russian interpretation of the war may have Ukrainian backing vocals.

Our land of the fifth rivers is putting together a test of solidarity. Testing your adaptability and stress resistance. All the research was carried out to the point that we had already completed the first month of the war - and therefore our report gives us the right to write about ourselves. We are rewriting the rules of war, making decisions that are known to be asymmetrical and achieving results that have never been seen before. And since we are able to stand on the battlefield, we will not be able to hope for victory at the expense of those who want to steal it from us.