There is nothing surprising in what the International Olympic Committee and some sports federations are doing with the admission of Russians to international competitions. This policy has a powerful theoretical basis and has now long become the alpha and omega of not only sports, but also the political and cultural life of the West.. At least the overwhelming majority of the Western " At the same time, the achievements of Western philosophy and political science, thanks to which Europe, North America, Japan, Australia and a number of other regions and countries were able to withstand the confrontation with the Kremlin and Lubyanka, with their puppets and satellites, were mercilessly thrown into the trash heap.

The following is the text in the original language. I’ll emphasize again: we’re talking about theoretical concepts and postulates. But, as Niels Bohr said, there is nothing practical for a good theory (later in the USSR this theory was attributed, of course, to Brezhnev). Prote in the XXI century Zahid, it seems, having forgotten the power of wealth - saying, the world has become new, not requiring to impose anachronisms on people. Tim himself discovered the possibility for these “anachronisms” to climb out of the crevices, gain strength and lay claim to all-power. And to say that “to carry the bows” of the United States, then perhaps it was important.

Also: at the 2026 Winter Olympics in Italy, Russian and Belarusian athletes will compete with the status of “individual neutral athletes” (AIN), without ensigns, anthems or national identity. Why don't you just give up on a rotten joke, or... or talk about totalitarian powers?! True, the concept of “totalitarianism” is the same as “unfashionable”, “outdated”, “uncultivated”, fashion is not uncommon in the West, and among the middle of the “stuck” Ukrainian commentators the concept of “authoritarianism” is read into those that Anglomovna wrote. He respects the most extreme and complete form of authoritarianism. […]. Totalitarian regimes are subdivided from other authoritarian regimes, the remainder being a country in which there is a single ruler of power, usually a dictator, a committee, a military junta or another small group.. A totalitarian regime can manage to control virtually all aspects of everyday life, including the economy, the educational system, mysticism, science, as well as the private life and morality of the people behind another fragmented ideology.. "

We recognized in the inventory of totalitarian powers those whose athletes were allowed to the Olympics as “individual neutrals”? I wonder what this has to do with “an extreme form of authoritarianism”? Behind such logic, we must say that pedophilia is “an extreme form of love for children”.... " Other aspects of the totalitarian regime include the widespread use of internment camps, the ubiquitous secret police, the practice of religious re-examination or racism, the imposition of theocratic rule or sovereign atheism, etc.. Again, many of the outlines of totalitarianism have been accurately christened, but it is still unclear why it is necessary to “shove” it into authoritarianism, especially since authoritarianism is a political regime, and totalitarianism is an all-pervading socio-political. Before the speech: Another world war began with the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact between two totalitarian powers and with the attack of first one, and then the other such powers on the authoritarian friend of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. And if you follow the “fashionable” logic, then. that a number of autocracies did not divide up the spheres and simply merged with each other... I started from Wikipedia, from which millions profit. And now a message has been sent to the knowledge of the last descendants of the Rada Sinpoes, writing that the authoritarian power is “turbated by political power, and will not be disgraced, it gives the commonwealth the greatest step of freedom.”. […] In this case, authoritarianism “does not attempt to change the world and human nature”. Tom Robert Conquest described a totalitarian power as one that “recognizes no frequent limits to its power in any sphere of domestic or private life and expands this power to any triviality that respects. And Richard Pipes said that the officially announced ideology “penetrates into the largest spheres of the suspense structure, and the totalitarian order cannot completely control the thoughts of its citizens.”.

I’ll point out once again that since we respect that Russia has an authoritarian, brutal regime, the thesis about Russians being “fooled by propaganda” is true. So Putin fooled them, sneered at them and sneered at them for his own gain. I said: this is Putin’s war, and Russians are not to blame. Please contact us for more information on any serious alternative sources of information.. However, there is absolutely no point in pointing out that Navalny, having completed his crooked activity, millions of Russians marveled at his materials and did not stand up against the “party of swindlers and thieves”, because we are talking about totalitarianism, about the “evil power”. Jaspers), about the ejection of tens of millions of people from power, about the Russian splendor, which lives on mythologies that replace reality, and the “party of swindlers and thieves” is not very good, not in tune with the mood of the masses.

At the same time, we should carefully consider the lower interests of today’s latest followers: they do not forget about “unfashionable” totalitarianism, they gently embrace this concept, they christen its insecurities, and they pay particular respect to. Prote, unfortunately, not in the mainstream, we accept for now, because of the lack of knowledge of the emerging political elite, understand what kind of monsters are on the right.

And once again: there are no and cannot be any “individual neutral” athletes from Belarus and Russia. They were simply not released from the other powers. And those who recently went to Sunset and distanced themselves from the policies of Minsk and Moscow, as far as I know, there are no Olympic athletes. Chi є?

And the Obov’yazkov axis is “the icing on the cake”. For days, IOC resident Kirstie Coventry said that the IOC has a responsibility to “keep the sport a neutral space where athletes can freely compete without being aware of the influx of politics and the divisions caused by regulations.”. And the Minister of Sports of Russia and the head of the Olympic Committee of this state, Mikhail Degtyaryov, stated that sport should be seen as politics. Degtyaryov is respected by the untruth of the expression “sport pose by politics”. Well, what is obligatory for Russia, the same in Belarus. Also, after the completion of the Olympics, “individual neutral” athletes from different directions to their respective powers will (perhaps, perhaps willingly) dance to the political music prepared for them, and the IOC will continue to respect that. І bring respect to the formula “splits caused by orders”. Then the aggressor and the victim of aggression are placed on one board. Miraculous Olympic ideals!