Yak i OBІTSYAV:.

.

. A small, illuminating book of the Ukrainian warrior"

.

.

. It would be fair and correct, as if the cost of winning the court in the ESPL were paid by the planters, who ILLEGALLY relieved me of my deputy mandate, and not by the belligerent Power.

Moreover, I have decided to pay this sum from my financial compensation for the decisions of the European Court on the rights of people to send to support the troops of our Army and I favorably appeal to the great number of people.

!

Supported by ZSU! ! Dovidkovo.

29 February 2016, the head of the Supreme Council of Ukraine, Volodymyr Groysman, is trying to resolve the issues? I am leaving the BPP and the Central Exhibition Committee on the side of Okhendovsky, WITHOUT A VOTE in parliament, voting about the pre-line appointment of my parliamentary representatives.

First of all, I have the status of a non-party people's deputy, a member of the BPP faction to protest against the anti-social, anti-humanitarian and corruption budget 2016, which is directly in line with the election program.

2nd quarter of 2016, I disapproved of the decision of the High Administrative Court, which on the 28th of June was inspired by a satisfied call.

7 February 2017, the European Court of Human Rights accepted before considering my appeal and rightly defended “Tomenko against Ukraine”.

On June 10, 2025, the ESPL praised the decision to recognize the actions of the Ukrainian authorities as illegal and decide to pay compensation.

The ECPL judges presented 15 arguments regarding the ILLEGALITY of the decision to pre-empt the parliamentary mandate.

Looking at the world, making decisions and taking care of goiters? Ukraine’s commitment to bring national legislation into line with European legislation and to implement European standards of human rights... praise for the Law on the IMPERATIVE MANDATE for people’s deputies is now becoming IMPOSSIBLE.

.