The 11th meeting was held in an online format between representatives of UPL clubs and curators of the judicial corps Nicola Rizzoli and Luciano Luchi.

Krivbas was present on the online platform with the judicial corps and put a number of supplies and introduced this proposition to reduce arbitration.

" It is possible to immediately remove information about the referee’s assessment by setting up a match inspector?

Proposition of FC Kryvbas: Bring information and assessment to the table.

What is the system of fines and punishment from the referee after an unsatisfactory assessment?

Proposition of FC Kryvbas: Proposed publicly based on the assessment of the inspector making a decision on the ground.

Who controls the inspector's decision and assessment

Proposition of FC Kryvbas: Create a visual group. To control their work, formulate ratings for inspectors.

What criteria are used when appointing arbitrators

Proposition of FC Kryvbas: Introduce a public blind referee draw for a match, taking into account logistical and geographical nuances.

What factors influence the promotion or demotion of an arbitrator in class?

Proposition of FC Kryvbas: Create clear evaluation criteria and an exchange system between leagues in accordance with the referee’s rating. Signing of contracts with a league for the beginning of the season starts with the rating.

Referees can give comments after matches?

Proposition of FC Kryvbas: When signing contracts with referees before the season, add a special clause to them, as is the case with most foreign championships.

What is the mechanism that protects arbitrators from being accused of pre-trial proceedings

Proposition of FC Kryvbas: All referees and court officials of the judicial corps undergo a polygraph test. This is one of the tools for minimizing doubts and suspicions of pre-emptive proceedings.

All these proposals are forwarded to the committee of arbitrators, we are ready to create working groups within the framework of which we will discuss the proposal of innovations and a more detailed explanation of our position. All points, and especially the remaining one, require more detailed discussion and clarification of all details and nuances. We remember that these changes will be to the detriment of not only all clubs, but also the judicial corps and all Ukrainian football in general. I would really like to joke about the possibility of solving naked problems, and not vindication,” according to the statement of the residents of Kryvyi Rih.

Apparently, it was previously reported that Minaya’s head coach Volodymyr Sharan reviewed controversial judicial decisions in the team’s matches.