Alternative versions of the reasons for the death of the MH17 flight put forward by the lawyers of one of the four defendants, Russian Oleg Pulatov, do not correspond to reality. According to an Ukrinform correspondent, Dutch prosecutors stated this during a regular court hearing in the MH17 case..

They once again emphasized that there is enough evidence of the involvement of the accused in the destruction of the MH17 flight..

The investigation of the Russian concern Almaz-Antey, according to prosecutors, is not expert and independent. They were never provided with information about the research methods.. Therefore, there is no need to return to the issue of alternative versions of the catastrophe..

Prosecutors also note that they have reliable witnesses, therefore they rejected the conclusions of a legal psychologist who was involved in the case by Pulatov's defense.. His lawyers insisted that the M58 witness, who claims to have seen the launch of a missile from a Russian Buk, was not guided by his own knowledge and memories..

" As previously reported, prosecutions in the trial of the downing of Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 require all four defendants - Igor Girkin, Sergei Dubinsky, Oleg Pulatov and Leonid Kharchenko - to be sentenced to life in prison..