Putin has an electoral paternalistic moods, Sobchak's supporters did not end the teenage crisis, Grudinin allegedly symbolizes justice, and Zhirinovsky's ability to make harsh decisions.

Until the election of the President of Russia there are 10 days. While candidates illegally and legally hang agitation banners, swear and pour each other with water, JustMedia correspondent. ru decided to find out which psychotype is considered the best electorate, and who will vote for the leaders of the presidential race.

On the image of the father, the teenage crisis, the seeming embodiment of justice and the ability to make harsh decisions, JustMedia readers. ru tells psychologist and philosopher Anna Kiryanova.

Sanguine - the best electorate I do not pretend to the truth in the last instance. I simply share my observations and reflections on the delusions and emotional impulses that may prevent the right choice. Therefore, I started talking about psychotypes and why people vote in one way or another; about the element of the "unconscious" in our choice.

The best electorate, this sanguine person. He has a good-natured temper, usually without a spite, but he can also answer. These are people who have processes of excitation and inhibition in the cerebral cortex balanced. Choleric, for example, cursed in the tax. He can go and vote for Ksenia Sobchak, only because at that moment he hated the Russian president and all the current authorities. Melanchol can not go to elections at all.

The phlegmatic was told: "Put a tick here", he will put there. These are the people who can say at the enterprises, in the state institutions, for whom they should vote, he will go and give his vote just for this person. It is generally quite a delicate moment. If you work for the state structure, then be ready to fulfill certain requirements in one way or another. And if you are so disgusted with power, why do you work for the state?.

Therefore, if a person in such institutions is simply forced to go to the polls - this is correct. But to force a person to vote for someone specific from a stick is a violation of his personal rights. And then he has the right to resist and resort to sabotage, like Mahatma Gandhi. Can go to the polls, but do not vote.

The more one presses on a person, the more negativism manifests in him - the desire to refuse. When a child is forced to collect toys, he most likely will refuse and say no. It's the same when an adult understands that they use pushing techniques. When you are gradually moved to the ballot box with a certain candidate, a resistance program is included.

In gestures much more than in words As for the psychotypes of the candidates themselves for the post of head of state. Yes, looking at the TV screen, you can say that Putin is a sanguine person, Zhirinovsky is a choleric. But the problem is that we are shown a certain person, image. What kind of person is really very difficult to see. On TV, we too could portray a choleric person or pretend to be a sanguine person.

A few years ago I had a shoot on Channel One with one of today's presidential candidates. The recording went on for a long time, and during the break he ate grapes and spat the bones on the floor. I decided to make a comment: touched quietly and pointed to the floor. In response, he spread his hands with an indignant face (a gesture of the type, leave me alone, that you are indignant at the garbage -. red. And in these gestures much more than in all his words.

People often choose those who have qualities that we ourselves lack. The principle of similarity, of course, is also valid. Therefore, a man of one temperament can vote for a candidate of a perfect other character store and vice versa. There is no dogma.

Vladimir Putin - the image of the father People have such a feature of the projection. When we look at another person - see what is close to ourselves, although they show us the picture. Assign certain qualities to the candidate. But in fact, we do not know a person at all or we know little about him. About Putin, as we think, we know a lot. He is familiar and familiar, does not cause anxiety and fear. There is no surprise effect. Therefore, automatically for him put the signature of people who avoid anxiety.

These are people with strong paternalistic attitudes. Speech about the expectation of parental care, the help of the father. For such people, the figure of the pope at the subconscious level is very important. The image of the father inspires confidence in them, and they want this person to have them. Any ruler automatically connects in the subconscious with the image of his father. And people who loved their father very much, or vice versa, were deprived of his father or his support, would be for Putin.

Note that such people are very fervently protecting him, as if he were their friend or relative. They are, as a rule, honest and responsible, because the image of the father symbolizes also the conscience. And in all the mortal sins of Putin blame, often, those who have had a bad relationship with their father. The majority of revolutionaries had psychopathic traits of character. They were all psychopaths. Because he (a revolutionary, an oppositionist,. red. ) it seems that the problem is not in his head, but in the world around him. Therefore, if you destroy the world around you, everything will be all right.

Revolutionary revolt is a rebellion against my father. When a teenager scandals in the family, he also opposes his parents. Ideals of the father and mother are overthrown. And such people get stuck in this state - they rebel against their parents, and it seems to them that against the existing authorities. To my generation, who lived in the 90s, it is hard to listen to revolutionary ideas. For one simple reason: we perfectly remember gangsterism, skirmishes on the streets and huge lines in stores. We do not want to repeat this.

Candidate-trickster Ksenia Sobchak. This candidate on the move changes his beliefs. At first there was a message "against all", now we see the advertisement "For Sobchak! ". This is a kind of joker, trickster. This is an unstable, yawning, buffoon character. It is released on stage to divert attention. For people to get the illusion that they will protest through this candidate. As they say, they will show the wad in the pocket of the existing authorities if they vote for this person.

Vote for such an applicant for the presidency of the Russian Federation is a joke for good or for nothing. These are people who have not yet had a teenage crisis in the depths. If we go back to the slogan "against all", a thinking population that would go to check this box (if it had not been canceled,. red. ), it is unlikely to vote for her. But people with negativistic teenage moods can.

But, again, do not underestimate such candidates. Once people went to vote for Adolf Hitler to spite the current authorities and considered him a clown, they drew cartoons. And under this sauce he came to power. So do not underestimate the candidates. It is necessary to see whether a person is really so stupid and comical as it seems.

Pavel Grudinin - the embodiment of justice In our moss-covered political field, nothing new has happened for a long time. And then a little-known person appears from the party with a fairly large electorate and is actively discussing it. Around him began controversy, this is some kind of boiling in political life. He has a chance to get a decent number of votes just because he broke in.

But he is still drawn to the old ideals. Grudinin also does not offer anything new. People who voted for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation will go for it, maybe those who saw something new in their program. These are people who are interested in social justice, agricultural development. People who do not want rapid change, but want justice. And they think that this person is just the embodiment of justice.

Vladimir Zhirinovsky - allegedly the ability to make harsh decisions Yes, he is called a clown, but how many years he is already on the political Olympus. Clowns, in fact, are not so simple. His provocative antics attract attention. It symbolizes not the opposition, but the energy and alleged ability to make harsh decisions. For him will go people who once saw it as an energy resource, the ability to change something.

But he, again, is an obsolete figure, like Yavlinsky, who many years later was dragged out to the polls. And then in politics it's hard to get back into the cage. Now he is already a venerable fossil, he has already lost his position. The remaining candidates, I believe, will not attract much attention of the electorate.

Count "against all" Count "against all", which we have abolished, in fact is very important. And it can not be replaced. Dogs with the slogan "against all" does not fit here. Such a graph is needed in order to be able to give the state an alarm signal. For example, a person does not see any worthy candidate and wants to bring it to the ruling officials. If so many people do, we will see a crisis of power and it (power,. red. ) will take something in response. Will introduce a new person to an important post or change something in politics.

Now this chance people do not have. And certainly clever and talented people who would go and put a tick in front of the phrase "against all", will not go to the polls in March.

Everything that is happening now resembles the Komsomol childhood. Interest in any election in people is declining. It's not just about the election of the main person, at any level. The inadmissibility of Aleksei Navalny also undoubtedly undermines interest in the elections. A large number of people were deprived of an alternative. We see that nothing is changing, that little depends on our participation, that all the slogans that you can be that important cog, because of which everything will change, is not true. When you go to the competition, the result of which is clear in advance, you do not get the pleasure of playing.

Everything that is happening now resembles my pioneer and Komsomol childhood. When I was a teenager, Leonid Brezhnev seemed a deep old man. Politicians were far from young people. And now the candidates are absolutely not addressed to the youth. Election Organization Machine is outdated. There is no understanding of the influence of the Internet and how vast the horizon of young people.

Well, who will read the newspaper you put in the mailbox. This is ridiculous and is designed for seated retirees' homes. From the debate, a show was made, designed for people who laugh when someone tossed a cake to someone or when they show bare priests. This is ridiculous until it comes to presidential candidates. There is no mutual respect for either the voter or the voter.

Do not be guided by the ghosts of consciousness Candidates need to work more with young people, speak its language, and not collect at some elite meetings near Seliger. And it's just that Putin has great chances to stay in power even longer if he works with young people correctly. Because it was their childhood that passed with him.

Generation up to 30 years is most important. And if they do not go to the polls, this is a very bad prognostic sign. In order to attract a candidate to a candidate, one needs openness and sincerity. Important personal charisma is also sincerity and ability to influence the public, this is both his competent speech, and the ability to inspire his thoughts and view of the world. Yes, you can imitate sincerity and trust, but for this you need to be, at least, an intelligent person and a professional politician. When there will be more sincere communication, including on the Internet, something will start to change.

But, again, now a huge amount of information is falling on people. You press the button of the computer, you leave on the Internet, you see a lot of information. And this also hinders. Because when you have two apples, it's easier to choose, and when it's a lot, there comes a glut of water and sometimes you do not even want to choose.

It is important to make an informed choice, and not rely on emotions. People who are guided by emotions are mistaken. As Francis Bacon said, they are guided by the ghosts of consciousness. A man must sit down, watch the programs, what he has achieved and what promises he has made.. You do not have to make a choice just because it attracts you, that this person is funny and clever to swear. The main thing - the more consciously the choice, the more it relies on the mind. Analysis is necessary if it comes to politics.