The Central Bank was in sheep's clothing. Usually he accused credit organizations of falsifying accounts and on this basis revoked licenses, and now accusations of forgery of documents are put forward against him. On the eve of the Arbitration Court of the capital, the question of the legality of revoking the license of the bank "Yugra". And the bank's lawyer openly accused the regulator of forgery. According to him, at the time of the introduction of the interim administration on July 10, 2017. the bank's capital was positive and amounted to 33 billion rubles. However, in the reports of the CB of the provisional administration of July 22, the bank's own capital was estimated at minus 7 billion rubles. On this basis, the lawyer of "Yugra" accused the Central Bank of "intellectual forgery" and demanded an examination of the documents submitted by the regulator. However, the court of accusation "Ugra" rejected, refused to review the expertise, the license was recognized as legitimate. "The disagreement with the data does not indicate a falsification of evidence," Kommersant quotes Justice Natalya Dana. It would seem that this is the final point in the case of "Ugra". The confrontation between the bank and the regulator has gone too far for the Central Bank to allow itself to retreat. In any case, this matter caused the Central Bank to get pretty nervous: it was too loud: it was the largest insurance event, and the main shareholder made public attempts to revitalize the organization after the license was revoked, and the intervention of the Prosecutor General's Office was required, and now the accusations of forgery have appeared "Businessman".

Thus, the main owner of Yugra, Alexei Khotin, has already drawn attention to the activities of the regulator in relation to banks. If you want, you do not want to, and the Central Bank has to give answers, even if not the ones that credit organizations and their clients hope for. And Khotin does not even think about giving up. Representatives of the bank reported that they will challenge the decision of the Arbitration in the highest instance. The struggle between Ugra and the regulator continues.