Many of the players of Chernomorets first saw each other on the field. But it is only those who know how to follow the news closely and see how the Odessa people rocked in the personnel plan. If you just rely on watching the game Chernomorets with Zirka, then we can assume the opposite - just Zirka looked like the team collected on the eve of the game. It seems that the players, during the two-week break, did not train, honing the combinations, working on the team teamwork, and went on vacation, in which they drank desperately. And, judging by their unintelligible appearance on the field - this night the show was in full swing, and in the morning Monarev awoke them and sent them to play.
Naturally, the question arises: how does this happen, what is the logic? One team storms: she fires the coach, exposes from the club a half-team of players, recruits new players already in the course of the championship, which immediately go on the field. Another team has already stabilized the squad, had a number of good meetings and had the opportunity in a calm atmosphere for two weeks to prepare for the game. As a result, Chernomorets at the very least, but playing, and Zirka the whole match goes on foot, can not tie in a row even three transfers, if they do not go back, and in the attack makes an emphasis on the amoebic combination - to give a long one from his half of the field. Not surprisingly, after an hour of play in Zirka's asset, there was only one hit on target.
The reason for such a paradox is very simple - it is certainly in the level of football players - it is the majority of players of the current convocation of the UPL is too low to allow to realize the advantage in teamwork. That is, you have been playing with this guy for a long time and you know where he will move in any situation, but your pass to a distance of more than three meters of such quality that the ball just does not reach him.
But some football players are not limited to. The main question is the coach's personality. Even if your team is not at the highest level in your team, then you can do at least two things: prepare physically and coordinate their actions on the field. There are a lot of examples when teams with mediocre players give a result simply due to the organization of the game. Yes, there is a long way to go - the Donetsk Olympic every six months drastically changes the composition, loses the leaders, but at the same time the team holds a certain level due to coaching.
The question to Monarev at a press conference: "What did your team do these two weeks at all?" Sounds a little primitive and threatens the author with some not very polite response, but it would be worth asking. Why not ask primitive questions about primitive games? After all, the question of some tactical decisions (if any) - too much for this action level of the championship of the region.