Ukrainian court did not recognize the fact of armed aggression of Russia against Ukraine, the initiator of the case, the human rights activist, head of the project "Open Court" Stanislav Batrin.

According Batrin, the decision not to recognize the fact of armed aggression against Ukraine was made Shevchenko Kiev court on 12 May on the basis of almost 2 years of judicial review. It is noted that the trial court had twice refused to open proceedings on the lawsuit, but a human rights activist won two victories in the courts of appeal, after the brow business still open. In the future, the first judge that heard the case, recused himself.

According Batrina, a significant role played in the judgment of the Presidential Administration's position, which actually called for the court not to accept the aggression of Russia against Ukraine.

"It is noteworthy that on February 9, the court entered a fax from the Presidential Administration with the signature B. Lozhkina with a request to postpone the hearing of the case "in order to create a legal position and to provide an explanation," and later the president's position was well-formed - the president asked dismiss the application for establishing the fact of armed aggression of the Russian Federation ", - he said.

As the human rights activist, a strange role in the judicial process has played a Ministry of the Interior, which has refused to provide cash to the court evidence of Russian aggression.

Recall that the human rights activist Stanislav Batrin more 29 August 2014 addressed to the Shevchenko district court with a demand to establish the fact of armed aggression against Ukraine. During the trial the applicant and volunteers were able to bring into evidence more than 1,000 pages of official documents of public authorities.